for me i felt it was more a film about the domestic violence than the house building, even though there are some quite joyous scenes with the house building and the way her neighbours come to help and all that sort of thing. i thought it was a clever undercurrent, but a real knot in your stomach constantly because you re constantly worried about the abusive man who you know is still out there. so here s the fascinating thing. if you actually look at the amount of screen time that you see, you know, it is flashbacks. it s fairly little and fairly discreet. yes. but this, it is like a tension in your gut, all the way through because they are interspersed as flashbacks and you feel they are the background everything. i think that is what is clever about the film, that is what is clever, what the former is doing is sugar coating the pill by making it apparently about putting the house together, as all this stuff, will it happen, will it work, all that stuff, but actually it is about someth
the way through because they are interspersed as flashbacks and you feel they are the background everything. i think that is what is clever about the film, that is what is clever, what the former is doing is clever, what the former is doing is sugar coating the pill by making it apparently about putting the house together, as all this stuff, will it happen, will it work, all that stuff, but actually it is about something more serious and i think if you are going to make something about this kind of story the challenge is to make it acceptable. will i enjoy watching it? well, yes, there is plenty to enjoy in herself. there is also plenty to be alarmed by, but i think that is a pretty good balancing act. by, but i think that is a pretty good balancing act. yes, i would auree, good balancing act. yes, i would agree. great good balancing act. yes, i would agree, great performances. i good balancing act. yes, i would i agree, great performances. great to see in cinemas agree, great per
language that president himself has used. it doesn t seem like the president has stepped back from that if anything he s pushing the gas pedal down further talking about revoking birthright citizenship which we ll talk about later on in the broadcast. which is not something he actually can do by fiat. but for him to continue to echo the words of, you know, invaders coming, it s certainly not tamping down any rhetoric and continuing to call the media the enemy of the people. you re absolutely right, anderson. and also sending in 500 troops on the weekend before the elections long before the marchers and the caravan ever reached the border. they don t need to be there this weekend. that s a ploy. and i do think that in the background everything that was happening today is the fact that many people in pittsburgh, many people around the country, they don t blame donald trump for the particular shooter. they don t hold him directly
on the weekend before the elections long before the marchers and the caravan ever reached the border. they don t need to be there this weekend. that s a ploy. and i do think that in the background everything that was happening today is the fact that many people in pittsburgh, many people around the country, they don t blame donald trump for the particular shooter. they don t hold him directly responsible. but they long for a presidency that has a moral core to it. a president that shows moral leadership. in the background today is a sense that somehow the president s words of resentment and hate and stirring up resentments especially among whites contributed to and led to the door of the synagogue. so i do think we ought to go back and think about, you know, how bill clinton went to oklahoma city in 1995 and healed. he didn t go after the terrorists. he didn t sort of make a beat the drums to go out and stalk the terrorists all around the country. he tried to heal and it was a
were bleeping part of things we thought that were inappropriate to air on a family news show like this. there have been stories that over the years buckley had this entire file cabinet of things that he felt were damming allegations about gore vidal. how personal was this feud? what was at stake between two of them was the nation they each thought the other the ideas of the other could take down the nation so it was personal on a huge scale. buckley, wasn t he concerned that the communist era was being ushered in and gore vidal, he was thinking that everything that his family his background everything they d sought to protect or be about, the war was undermining that. these guys were like loggerheads. totally loggerheads. it was when i first saw this footage i was i couldn t