everyone, and judge jeanine pirro along with richard fowler, jesse watters, katie pavlich, and greg gutfeld, it s 5:00 in new york city, and this is the five. so let the debate trash talk begin, joe biden and donald trump are sharpening their attacks as they get ready to meet face to face for the cnn presidential debates three days from now and simulcast on fox news. the two candidates are using wildly different prep strategies, sleepy joe is still holding up at summer camp david, the big guy surrounding himself with an army of advisors. a staggering 16 people are helping our elderly man with a poor memory get into top shape. one report claims that joe biden is doing mock debates and practicing, on a stand for 90 minutes. the liberal media is also giving joe some pointers like how to smile and benefit from that mute button. he has resting old faced, right, so he needs to smile and when he smiles it goes away a little bit, and when he smiles, his face comes alive. i wo
the president committed bribery or extortion. i also reject the notion that holding this view means supporting all the foreign policy choices we have been hearing about over these last few weeks. he, in fact, called is blundering. clearly no fan of what happened and how it happened, but if will hurd had said, i m for impeachment, there might have been some who follow him because of his experience and he s on the committee. when you have someone like that saying, nope. that tells us where we are. he was pretty clear about where he s going to fall, and i do think that s the splitting the baby argument we ll hear from republicans. probably a couple in the house and even more in the senate. this idea of, i don t agree with this, i don t agree with the precedent, we don t think it reaches that very high bar to actually impeach him. he does have little to lose because he s a young man who clearly wants a future in politics and he s from texas.
and some democrats are concerned that this is a, happening too late, and b, that it s possible the white house is agreeing to a deal stall essentially jam democrats into agreeing to something that does not go far enough on the issues that they care about, an they ll ultimately be in a position of either voting to agree with their president and raise the debt ceiling or risk default and untenable position in their view. untenable in their view. let s dig into the detail. what do we know about the framework that s being discussed and especially the parts that democrats don t like? reporter: well, based on our reporting today, this broad outline which again has in the been agreed to would include roughly $3 trillion deal that would have about $1 trillion in spending cuts, some of which would kick in immediately, some would be spread out over time. and then there would be a tax component and an entitlement component that would happen after the debt ceiling is raised. but othe
no one is speaking publicly about it, but i have been in touch with some democrats on the hill who are still very upset this evening after that meeting. the bottom line is they have heard these outlines of a possible framework of a deal. and some democrats are concerned that this is a, happening too late, and b, that it s possible the white house is agreeing to a deal that will essentially jam the democrats into agreeing to something that does not go far enough on the issues that they care about, and they ll ultimately be in a position of either voting to agree with their president and raise the debt ceiling or risk default and untenable position in their view. untenable in their view. let s dig into the detail. what do we know about the framework that s being discussed and especially the parts that democrats don t like? reporter: well, based on our reporting today, this broad outline which again has in the been agreed to would include roughly $3 trillion deal that would