it s so it s not going to be a one size fits all. coast to coast a. but the left doesn t want the voters to have a say and they don t care about facts or principles for them. that that leak of the draft opinion itself orchestrated it sisseminated as it was meant to terrorize, not torr influence. think about this . why would someone leak what was a three month old draft opinion that was already in some form or another coming out probablymi in june anywayng? en and tonight, though, given everything i ve seen, everything i know about the court and its inner workings from the time i clerked, i m going to say that i believe this leak was done with the goal of stoking violence againstju the conservative justices primarily on the courtst. in other words, the goal toe force a change in the courts makeup before the november sounds nefarious.efarious. sounds like a i know it sounds like a totally horrifying prospect, but those
that s the framing off this . i mean is gaslighting. it s laughable. they re saying that these pro-life groups are threatening conservative justices. that doesn t make sense. i mean, these conservative justices are getting threats against their life online and elsewhere right now in the justice department needs to t needs to step it up. they need to start making arrests for conspiracy, for obstruction, for assaultar. carrie, i want to read a recentc passage from a website a lot of lawyers read called scotus blog and start from the premise that there were actually at t least two leakershr and three leaks. the first leakea to the wall street journal editorial board last week and substance it was that the court had voted to overrule roe but that the precise outcome remains in doubt because chief justice john roberts is trying to persuade either j kavanaugh or barrett to a more moderate position. carrie, knowing these two
them deserve total transparency . and just to the south, a leftist judge in west virginia has justt tossed a republican candidate from the ballot even thoughca earlyh though voting is already underwayd and the primary is just days t away qunol a circuit court judge, duke blum ruled that voteses for a district senate candidate andrea garrettd .re andrea garrett kiessling wouldga not be countedrr due to issues o over her residency. now immediately signs were posted at polling places announcing that she is ineligible. but andrea garrett kiessling is. fighting back saying she always has been a west virginian and that this isis disenfranchizing to the voters. the candidate made an appeal to the supreme court to put a stay on judge bloom s ruling and hours ago they rejected that motion. joining us now is gop state senate candidate andrea kiessling and her campaign
said? oh , i suresa hope so. i mean, i agree. i think this is one of the mostt concerning things about this leak. not only does it strike a blow at the trust inherent in the internal workings of the court, but this is a real act of threat against the justices themselves. i know that they are ramping up security, but this is why i think in a lotot of us have said let s let s just issueop this opinionin quickly. though i think it s no surprise though. i mean, jen psaki remember used to work for demand justice. this is like m group out there. praisig these are t the people who were praising the leaker saying we need more supreme court leaks.. this is the people that the board member who says the constitutionre trash and should be scrapped. they want to have more justices yesterday they said on the court they re trying tort use this to kind of pack the courts even if they can t switch this decision now or someone said even let s packeogo the court before the end of the term. oh , my goodne
by what i heard from justices cavanaugh and barrettvana from those arguments becauseba they both seemed to get it. s gt cavanough i liked his language where he said the court should remain strictly impartial here just scrupulously neutral and not say we re going toy be pro-choice, we re not going be pro-life. we re just going to say let the people decide these issues. justice barrett was talking about, you know, the abilityty give their child up for adoption, how this really shows how far we ve come in our country. we can say whereho they were going to switch. yeah, well, i would i would hope that all the justices would come out and unequivocally condemn these these terroristic acts on the part of activists and say this will not stand and they need to find this leaker or leakers, i should say, out of the out of the supreme court. this can t be thishis difficultd it really wants to be found out. to seewad mike, great you both.nt to thank you . and the left wants youve to avet your eyes