Department charged at least 450 people in connection with January 6th insurrection at the u. S. Capitol. Is the ultimate outcome in doubt . The ultimate outcome is not in doubt. The delay is over a separate matter. It is about how to deal with this bill to try to combat the rise of china. But it is all tied together. The January 6th Commission Bill is after this debate over this chin bill. Right now a handful of senators are dragging out The Process on this China Bill. Dhet do that under the rules of the senate for up to 30 hours. And then there are a handful of votes on that China Bill. And then there could be an additional 30 hours of debate. And then that could drag out into the weekend until we get to the January 6th commission vote. Now what is more likely is that eventually the senators who are concerned about this China Bill will relinquish their time and get to that vote. It could take some hours to play out here today. I can tell new talking to republican senators and democrat
Giulianis evolution of the federal raid of his apartment and what looks to be a Serious Criminal Probe against one of the greatest advocates and former lawyers for the former president. Giuliani running to Fox News like hes done many times before representing trump and just as hes done for his own client when he was in legal trouble, giuliani is doing the same for himself, making things worse when he talks to fox. Weve said it before, Rudy Gonna rudy. May 1st is when i started representing Donald Trump. They wanted nothing on me before that. So you cant say that the main Entrance Wasnt Donald trump. Just about the day that i begin representing him is the day they go invade my icloud. So try telling somebody it wasnt to Get the material on Donald Trump. That might sound somewhat reasonable depending on how suspicious you are of the government. But who are they . Hes talking about this starting back during the trump administration. They are trump appointees, including Bill Barr who had t
discussion with god, why are they only attacking one or in reference to mr. to mr. wade? and then she goes on. to say, god isn t it them playing the race card when they only question one. now, if she had been truthful with that congregation, truthful with the community, she would ve said i had a relationship with him good, bad, forgive me. whatever that s what she should have said. but she chose to deflect and say the them the reference to them and the others and they saw obviously a reference to that motion filed by him by ms merchant s. they choose to go after the black man and she then goes on again deflecting away and deflecting to the what i call the third rail in american society, choosing somebody on the other side of being a racist so and so is a racist. they re racist she was the one playing the race card in a way to try to deflect from her own conduct she goes on to say in discussions with the lord, god, is that is it that some some will never see a black man is qua
exposed in the depths of his political depraft at this and corrupt and criminal acts has been laid bare. not by radical leftists, or any of us in the media but by his inner most circle and the really, really committed ones as that. the trump officials who stayed on until the bitter last days of a bitter presidency tell us the riveting story of not one, not two but three criminal conspiracies that trump stands accused of by the united states government, in essence against the united states government. by the numbers jack smith has charged three criminal conspiracies, four criminal counts, named six unindicted co-conspirators and shined the light on one who was willing to overturn his election defeat. the indictment brought by jack smith against donald trump makes the coup plot he directed crystal clear for the world to see. here is how the justice department explains the first criminal count as the conspiracy to defraud the u.s. quote, the purpose of the conspiracy was to over
flipped. today nbc news caught this video of him. have you testified for the grand jury? i don t talk about anything january 6th related. do you think it s appropriate, the investigation? so he does not say anything about january six to reporters, but he did meet with a grand jury. you can conceivably watch that video and see a former white house chief of staff who simply does not want to speak with the reporter. that s pretty common. but today republican presidential candidate and former federal prosecutor chris christie offered a different interpretation of it when speaking with andrea mitchell. that looks to me like somebody who is cooperating with the federal government. you know, witnesses, grand jury is secretive for the government. the government cannot reveal not for the witness. and the witnesses told, as they leave, you don t have to answer any questions or talk about it, but you are free to do so if you like. the only time you can t do it is when th