oswald did it. and we tried hard to do that. but at every turn with the kennedy assassination, things pointed to oswald as not only a shooter, but the shooter and the only shooter. lee harvey oswald had these dreams or delusions that he d been harboring for a long time of an act that would lift him from his obscurity. oswald used to attend a small discussion group. and he began to rail against this right wing general, edwin walker. general walker was about as right wing as you got in the early 60s. and oswald saw walker as an american adolf hitler. and oswald said someone should kill walker. he then ordered a rifle with a sniper scope, and he planned very meticulously his assassination of general walker. and then he went on the night of the 10th of april, took up
general walker was about as right wing as you got in the early 60s. and oswald saw walker as an american adolf hitler. and oswald said someone should kill walker. he then ordered a rifle with a sniper scope, and he planned very meticulously his assassination of general walker. and then he went on the night of the 10th of april, took up his place and shot at general walker. he was very disappointed to find out that he missed by less than an inch. it shows his ability to plan who his target was and that oswald was capable of violence. i think that was kind of the rosetta stone that if you understood the walker shooting, you understood that lee was like a cocked rifle. and he could go off anytime.
general walker was about as right wing as you got in the early 60s. and oswald saw walker as an american adolf hitler. and oswald said someone should kill walker. he then ordered a rifle with a sniper scope, and he planned very meticulously his assassination of general walker. he took photographs from different angles, he figured out how to get his rifle there and how to escape. on march 31st, a sunday, he asked marina to come out and take his photograph. all in black, pistol, rifle in his hand, holding a few radical newspapers, and marina writes on the back hunter of fascist and dates it april 6th, 1963. and then he went on the night of the 10th of april, took up
reconstruct each moment of the assassination. part of the reason why i think the film captured the american imagination is because it pushes us to think about something more complex. and each person who looks at it, you know, people see different things. where did the shots come from? if the shots did not all come from the book depository window, then there was most likely some form of conspiracy. i think that the massive head wound where the president s head was literally blown apart came from a quartering angle on the grassy knoll, it struck, and his head doesn t go directly back this way but it goes back and over this way, which would be consistent with the shot from that direction and newton s law of motion. seven men on a railroad bridge right here said that when the shots were fired, they looked toward the wooden fence and each of the seven said he saw puffs of white smoke come from here. you glance over underneath that green tree, and you can see a little puff of smoke
theorists who have put this case under a high-powered microscope, splitting hairs and then proceeding to split the split hairs. the kennedy case is now the most complex murder case by far in world history. nothing even remotely comes close. we are left with the series of real and critical questions about the assassination. questions which have not been answered to the satisfaction of the people of the united states. when president kennedy was killed, he was not killed by one man. he was shot from a number of different directions by different guns. the story has been suppressed. witnesses have been killed. and this is your country. we aren t trying to hide a thing from you or from mr. epstein or mr. lane or the world. we are laying it all out. that s right here in the notes of testimony. and if we have transposed in error a possibly into a probably, then we are delighted to have you point it out to us. but you can do so only because we ve laid it on the line.