Assad Into News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Assad into. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Assad Into Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Assad s capability to strike at his people with chemical weapons it dents the narrative there s a global war going on against islamists by americans. that is crucial. [ overlapping speakers ] that s an overwhelmingly naive thing to say. i m not saying he s not a muslim. try to make that case to the overwhelming majority of the syrian people. shia. doesn t it depend who you re making the argument to? the soon is in or the alowites or the christians? the main gripe with assad began because he was a dictator who tortured. why do the christians now fear the opposition more than assad? they fear the jabat faction of the opposition. they re right to. we don t use the word opposition in that generalized way. talk about libya, syria, egypt, there was a feeling during the arab spring that the narrative of al qaeda was fading, that the whole idea of violence in order to get democracy was fading and they ....
Siding with the fundamentalists. reports that militants are preparing another attack, this time against israel, cannot be ignored. now, you ve seen the classified intelligence. does he have any case to make there? no. look, only in russia and putin s parallel alternate universe could you believe that. let s add the facts up for a moment. the facts are these. that there is no question that the delivery system of the chemical weapons were through missiles. if the rebels had missiles they d be striking at his artillery and his aircraft. they don t have missiles number one. number two, ought of our satellite intelligence shows that the delivery of those missiles came from areas controlled by assad into the rebel areas. we also know that assad s regime as it relates to chemical weapons are fully vetted for loyalty to the regime and under its absolute control. and we know, basically, that access to chemical weapons does not exist at this point in time ....
Believe that the only reason that the russians are even maneuvering in this way and considering the possibility is because of the credible use of force if that was not there we would neither hear russia making any offer nor would we hear the syrians contemplating some. senator, so what do you think is going on in the kremlin? here they are your guess is as good as mine. but your guess is probably better than mine. so let me ask you, what s going on? they get together and say let s write this op ed for the new york times and play to public opinion, which is against president obama, and divide america even more. i mean, what s the thinking here? i think there are two things going on here. first of all, i think the russians did see the contemplated possibility of strikes against assad, and that would have weakened him. even though our purpose was to pursue the delivery mechanisms for chemical weapons, it would have degraded assad significantly. it could have by consequence ....
This offer and sincerity of it. but we have to test it both at home and abroad. doesn t the security council resolution is what you must agree. to because the russians in the past have agreed to have iran abandon their nuclear weapons and then backed off of that. the russians also agreed to a similar proposal to allow nuclear enrichment in their country for iran and then backed off of that as well. wouldn t include teeth. so if they agree to this and then syria balks, what should russia how should the rest of the world enforce it? well, that s why a security council resolution is critical in order to achieve what we hope what we would hope can happen. look, a potential result of this could be far more positive. we were ready to strike, to stop assad s abilities to have weapons that deliver chemical weapons. if you can eliminate the chemical weapons that s a greater desirable result. but it has to be real. and look, the only reason i ....
Politically. the same people who are telling us not to do this now were telling us not to do this two years ago when a lot could have been accomplished. hold on, andrew. second i propose that we help these people military by arming them and destroying assad s monopoly of the skies which is the only thing that is keeping the opposition from making any real military advancement. exactly his point. exactly what mr. noar is saying. for me having been in bosnia and elsewhere and seen all this, and actually obviously seeing what majit has said, in libya, kosovo, bosnia still, people are grateful for what the united states did. and that is in the united states interests! [ overlapping speakers ] andrew go ahead. i just think these arguments sound as if the iraq war never happened. andrew, the iraq war is not the only thing one need to know about the american foreign policy. biggest disaster in american foreign policy which you have supported and not recanted from. ....