Plus dennis quaid. Im a football player. Theyre going to pump up the volume here. What happened yesterday . A former president being prosecuted by the sitting president will leave a blackco stain on the fabric of this country. But lets not forget whose move this was. The New York Times reported that joe biden directed his Attorney General to prosecute his rival prosecu. Quote, mr. Biden privately told his close circl e of advisers that mr. Trump posed a threat to democracy and should be prosecuted for his role in the events of june 6th. Of according to two people familiar with his comments. He also told confidence that he wanted Attorney General Merrick Garland to stop acting like the Attneral To A Ponderoud to take decisive action. Dent this is not an independent justice department. This is not an indepen stice ded. Special counsel. This prosecution is being directedecutio by the commander in chief and now the Corporate Media is engaged in Aengage Bloodthirsty and libelous wad r again
i would go with biden. forget about mayorka2024 ei wous and garland. these are small potatoes at this point. you go for the big guy because that s where the big guy is.as b do you thineen k the democras understanddemocr that they re gg to have to grapple with foreign bank accounts from the biden family wires from russian text,t messages that we re reading, eyewitness testimony? how are they going to defend that? dana: i are aboutt 48 48 hours away from reading anonymous quotes in th ferats new york times from concerned democrats who are really worried about the evidence that s coming out, just like about two months ago, we got anonymous sources sayingt they re very concerned about kamala harris and her position as vp. harris and they re very concere about joe biden s health and age. so these conversations so are taking place within the democratic party, they re pretty disciplined. th leak out too much.are st but there are strategic leaks. and you see governor newsoras a he s
Methodical, bringing the factse. and building the case. so at the end of the inquiry, they caso ary,n lee the evidence and say, we have e havethe records, we havehe the officers, we have the emails, we have the whistleblowers. joe bide e-mails. n, you re either going to tell us you re not running for reelectionl us, john, or wee going to launch a full blown impeachment. this is whatn imhmen that does.o if joe steps down, promises not to run for reelection gavin newsom and gretchen whitmer are the ticket. kamala, i m sorry, but there s no way biden is going to survive a full blown house impeachment. there s just no way it last . nthse a full-blown all of this evidence is on the table. table. forcedthe media to engage on it. but if joe wants to rollt. the dice, republicans movet. with impeachment. but without the impeachment, withachmen back to back to back to back trump trials. the media is not going to cover anything else. biden s going to hidel is and trump s going to be crimina
Right and follow the evidence where it leads impeachmenteads,m is going to run counter to tr year.istrial s next dana perino, as my co-host of the five and co-anchor of america s newsroom, she joins me now. ink it i i think it s smart the way the house is moving towardve to impeachment, because you have to put something against pug ag in the spring. do you see it playing out out this way? it could. it of depends on these documents. the fact that joe ziegler, thatw one of the irs whistleblowers is going to reveal higoinmore documents. i think one of the things that s happening is if the house republican happenis s are thinking, let s sequence this, we can match up with thewe trump trialsmatch up, things mio might work. but also, if these documents come iese docu out and they shoe assume that they might show, thenat you will have some people in the house, you know, champing at the bit to try to move faster . morrow they re going to want w to impeach tomorrow. i mean, they want
We ve been trying to figure it out. prime time filed a couple ofcoke foia requests with the secret service and the fb titi. the secret service. they were the first ones to tell us. now we re appealin secretg. pealin and then today, the fbi followed suit and denied a requesg. st for any expedited cocaine docks, telling us that finding cokecs telli in the whio is not, quote, a matter of widespread and exceptionala in media interest in which there exist possible questionsnt about the government s integrity, which affect public confidence. s no one at all is questioning the government s integrity. ffet we only heard three different stories about where the coke was founwhere thd and then whato house lied about not being on the scene. the coke was in a surveillance camera, a blind spot, and then not a singlecamera trace of dnar fingerprints were recovered. and the secret service blew up the bag of coke. they literally lit it on fire. that s destroying evidence. and this is the same sec