Of the word, he is the key figure of the war party. But at the same time , a completely unexpected turn of events cannot be ruled out. Why . Because, of course, patrushev is a supporter of the whole concept of the destruction of ukraine and the conflict with the west, but at the same time it is quite likely that he can insist, or at least propose a scenario or at any rate an operational game around a ceasefire scenario, this is quite possible. Here is the problem. In which we do not see any from the side of the military directly, who should actually put putin on the table some successes on the battlefield. Which of these militaries offers a longterm military strategy for this war . That is, what to do . We read, and everyone sees it, of course, that the kremlin is going to storm kharkiv or capture odesa, or maybe it is going to go to the banks of the dnieper, everywhere. All these are political fantasies, they become reality even inside. Russian policy only if there is a military plan,
Has been cooperating with the rashists since the first weeks of the occupation, helped them build roads in the steppes around the village, removed ukrainian state symbols from boxes and brought fuel from crimea for sale. At rashishtakh , he voluntarily took the post of the head of the village. Akymenko anatol sergeyovych, head of the karabakh keta administration. I renounce ukrainian citizenship, because ukraine is a terrorist state, we have been convinced of this since the 14th year. I wonder how this clone works. Russia will then remove or discard it, as it did with hundreds of other devices. This headless head conducts active copper activities, demonstrates all the advantages of lying under russia, advises locals on how to get russian passports, carries social benefits from the raga and repaints sarlo in trikolar. Be with his head, perhaps, as well as carrying his head on his shoulders, this traitor does not have long left. Ours from the ssu is already on the way. This traitor in un
And followup with a little good discussion here between him and me and then let your questions. All that by 230. It will be a crisp, boom boom session. Mr. Mccarthy is a native of chicago. A bachelors degree in history which seems appropriate given what i have around vmi and all of the traditions and history that it holds and sustains our country. Then joined in an Operational Army unit was deployed in afghanistan during his 1997 and two 2002. As a soldier. With combat with rangers in afghanistan. I think secretary mattis was there as well. Since that time has done all of the additional things that you want someone to do so as a kind of job he is today. Because he is worked on capitol hill. He has worked as a special assistant to both secretary gates and also the under secretary of defense for Acquisition Technology and logistics and he has been in the Defense Industry most recently prior to coming to the pentagon when he was with lockheed martin. Many of you know that after his confir
Seriously considered. Senator mccain has already referenced them. One is i think we have to take a hard look at overhead. The army but not just the army but the military across the board, all of the services to include department of defense are very very Large Organization with a big bureaucracy with a significant overhead. A second is acquisition. As already previously mentioned, theres a considerable amount of cost and in many cases waste in the acquisition process. We need to get that under control. And the third and final piece that i think is worth taking a look at theres a wide variety of emerging technologies that could in the outyears could lend itself to automated processes and reducing either manpower or manpower costs, compensation cost over time. Thats three big areas that would want to lock at if confirmed. We have russia creating a looming threat in europe, we have the pacific and chinas expansion or i should say increased activity there. We have the ongoing war in the mi
That we made. Among the most contentious issues over the past two years involved the armys restructuring initiative. I understand the army has been put in a difficult position by budget reductions and over the past several years has been exploring a number of option to maximize come pat power while at the same time trying to combat costs. Congress has similarly been taking a hard look at this which is why the commission of the structure of the army was established in the ndaa. If confirmed will you comment to thoroughly reviewing the armys Aviation Restructuring Initiative and working closely with congress once the Commission Report is delivered next year to help us figure out the best path forward on Army Structure issues . Absolutely will and i look forward to reviewing the Commission Report. And what do you think are the biggest threats that should you be confirmed youll have to prepare the army to address in the coming decade . I think the armys fundamental mission of engaging in g