Happened. It seems dubious that the Russian Military, in other words, would want to take down a major passenger plane. Certainly with not the intent of taking it down. Again, we simply dont know who brought this down. Im also here with lieu dtenant colonel rick francona. Just in terms of kants, we have not seen separatists heretofor, they have brought down at least one transport plane, but they were not flying at 33,000 feet. Yeah, this would require, as we were talking about, a more sophisticated system. Talking about, you know, hitting it inadvertently, it would be very difficult for that to happen. Generally once youre locked onto the target, it goes to that target. And if it veers off that target and is no longer being guided, they selfdestruct. But when youre targeting a plane at that altitude, are you
clear on exactly what kind of a plane it is . No, its a return on your radar. Right. It will be a certain size, you can estimate the size of the aircraft. You may have other sensors
That sometimes sets americans against one another and instead make big goals and ive set forth some big goal, getting the economy to work for everyone, not just those at the top. Making sure we have the best Education System from preschool to college and making it affordable and so much else. If we set those goals and go together to try to achieve them, theres nothing in my opinion that america cant do. So thats why i hope that we will come together in this campaign. Obviously, im hoing to earn your vote, hoping to be b elected in november and i can promise you, i will work with every american. I want to be the president for all americans. Regardless of your political beliefs, where you come from, what you look like, your religion. I want us heal our country and bring it together. Our children and grandchildren deserve. Thank you. You have two minutes. Well, i actually agree with that. I agree with everything she said. I began this campaign because i was so tired of seeing such foolish
isis. they will have 30 days, but we re at the six month mark, and that has yet to happen. let s bring in pentagon correspondent barbara star. president trump always said he doesn t like to reveal his plans. have we gotten any glimpse in his administration s new strategy to fight isis? well, there s been bits and pieces like arming rebels and working with opposition groups, but an overall comprehensive strategy, not at this point. and the president was here at the pentagon today in the tank with top officials for two hours discussing all of this. described to us as a chin-scratching session, walk around the world to look at all of the threats. the pentagon press secretary came out to brief us, offcamera, no surprise there, and what she told us that when it came to discussing pakistan, afghanistan, and the korean threat, the discussion was not needy, her words. little bit odd to know why the president was here for two
single time, they have used those weapons against us years later. so, i m very leery about this idea of arming rebels. lisa: the reason why russia has such a significant role in syria is because president obama leaned on them and allowed them to have a role after drawing the redline. he deferred to russia and allowed russia to have a bigger presence.. richard: that s not true.e. putin has always been and with assad especially after turkey fell.. the weapons of assad are russian weapons. jesse: once you analyze the current situation kimberly: first of all, i want to say, i thought that was excellent reporting. he told the truth on a story that was favorable and honest and accurate about what is going
the isis leaders would be. they re gone. because everybody s talking about how iraq which is us with our leadership goes into fight mosul. now, with these 200 admirals and generals, they can t believe it. all i say is this. general george patton, general douglas mcauthur are spinning in their grave as the stupidity of what we re doing in the middle east. secretary clinton, you want assad to go. you advocated arming rebels. it looks like that may be too late for aleppo. you talk about diplomatic efforts. those have failed. cease fires have failed. would you introduce the threat of u.s. military force beyond a no-fly zone against the assad regime to back up diplomacy? i would not use american ground forces in syria. i think that would be a very serious mistake. i don t think american troops should be holding territory