Florida. Now a Magistrate Judge would have to him to enter his plea at its root what the arraignment is it something fundamental to the rule of law and our constitutional system. You are given a right to hear the nature of the charges against you. The other thing that happens if they decide the conditions of your release. Trump is not expected to be put in jail ahead of this trial, but there will be discussion of the terms under which he is released on his own recognizance. That happens in his federal indictment in florida and we expect that will happen again today. That part of the process is somewhat unpredictable. You never know exactly what the judge will want to talk about. We will know about it as soon as we are allowed to. As we said, cameras are not allowed. We will have no live feed as it happens. Nbc is lucky enough that our reporter is one of the few reporters who have been given a seat in the actual courtroom. We will talk with garrett once it is over. We will also get disp
hundred nine for one seven three to six .n let us know what you like, whato you don t like. we re going to hear from some of you live at the end of each show starting tonight. alsonight., tonight, coming up, the hannity hot hot seat is back .st stay tuned. i llay tuned i wil go one on one very, very lucky liberal. luc and then later, the one smith and only stephen a. smith. he s going to join us with join injuryyhorrific to buffalo bills star damar hamlin hamlyn and his fam entire family there in our nation s prayers tonight. but first, we begin this new year with a fox news alert.s it is day one of the one hundred and eighty eight congress and house republicans now are becomin on the verge of becoming a total clown show if they re not carefug a total. but despite the cheering and elation from democrats and the moring of b and the media, it s not a dire situation yet. situan now, here s where we are at con this hour. a contentious battle for speakeerr is underway after fall
judge, which i thought was interesting. no order along those lines. no commentary whatsoever. that s something that could happen if at some point trump began attacking the judge or the prosecutors in such ae manner that the special counsel s office decided to do something about it. it s a delicate situation when you have somebody running for president. the courts and the government areur going to bend over backwas to try to respect their right under the first amendment to speak. there s a line between speech andli threats and intimidation. it will be interesting to see whether we will explore in this case or other cases where that line rests. ken, thank you. let me ask you one last question. i know you have been inside until moments ago when you ran out to get to the camera, for which we are grateful. when you a saw today and since u have come out and what you can see where you are, is there any how would you describe the presence of onlookers and
throughout my life, that there s nothing worse thanlong losing a child. it s taken a long time. first of all, does thatto give you any peace of mind? do you want to know details? where where are you in thise it grieving process? i would imagine that s not s something you get overething. honestly, i feel a little bit t lucky knowing that we havehe somebody in there s a person of interest. nothing feels worse thanthan h e nobody and just nothing but doubt. and seven week n weeks s of that areur close to seven weeks of that was a tremendous amount of pressure. you know, your children look on us. tel and , you know, your children happen look for you to tell the am what s going to happen and howtl anything.e going to go. and you can t you you can t control anything. and you just sit back and you just wait and it s very hardm to get over. and kristi, your mo m, thisin. is your precious your beautiful daughter, and you will never seimaginl of thee her again. i can t imagine all the pain
audience there. clarence clarence thomas, who s on record saying that back in nineteen sixty four, the actual standard was simply conjured up out of thin air by the supreme and it bears no relation to the first and the fourteenth amendment . neil gorsuch, who said it s an ironclad subsidy for the publication of falsehoods and they re both right and we learned today how incredibly irresponsible and reckless the new york times is. this guy james bennett simply inserted the language without any justification, without any evidence. a second of all, he did soen under deadline pressure but there was no vetting. there was no fact checking. third, he refused to take down the published editorial because of the new york times policy against that . and finally he refused to apologizeed to his readers for sarah palin because he said, well, you know, apologize areur extremely painful tona our journalists who gives a ? let s get your take so on .