Arent Privy News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Arent privy. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Arent Privy Today - Breaking & Trending Today
That now? the description, 6 foot 3, wearing dark clothing and a backpack, orange sunglasses. a tip line as well for our viewers at home. 213-382-9470. have you gotten tips at this point, sir? well, you know, i m a los angeles county deputy district attorney and as such we usually aren t privy to the facts and circumstances of the investigation until the case is formally presented so what you know is what we know at this point. i m sure the los angeles police department has some information that they are not revealing to the public along with that which they are. it should also be mentioned there is a dana: what do you make of that? you look at that over the course of several years arrested that many times. yeah, you know, without ....
they thought it was incomplete. there was an omission of facts. that s fine. if they want to put out their memo. let s do that. the other thing is, it s a false narrative when you say what mr. mccabe wasn t quoted correctly because there was an attorney from the fbi who was part of the fisa application and also was in on the interviews that said that was an accurate statement that the that this couldn t have gone through without the dossier. would you support the release of the transcript of any relevant part of andrew mccabe s testimony? this has been a big point of contention that seems just factual in nature, those of us who aren t privy to the transcripts are interviews. were you both present for the mccabe? i was. were you? i wasn t. would you support the release of any relevant transcript that would support what mccabe thinks about how important the steele dossier was to the fisa warrant just so we can clear this up? ....
Everything in there was factual. the fbi did put out a statement saying they thought it was incomplete, that there were omissions of fact. that s fine, and that s why if they want to put out their memo, let them do that. it s a false narrative when you say mr. mccabe wasn t quoted correctly because there was an attorney from the fbi who was part of the fisa application, and also was in on the interviews that said that that was an accurate statement, that this couldn t have gone through without the dossier. so would you support the release of the transcript of any relevant part of andrew mccabe s testimony? because this has been a big point of contention that seems just factual in nature, although those of white house aren t privy to the interviews, were you both present for the mccabe interview? i was, yes. were you as well? not for that one. would you support the release of any relevant transcript that would support what mccabe things about how important the steele ....
One of your stories. there s, obviously, an inherent bond between military families, and one mother shared her story talking about her son returning home and the joy she felt, but all the at the same time she felt the pain of another mother whose son did not return home. so my question to you is why is it is important that anybody read this book? you know, people who may not, aren t privy to the very challenging lives that military families face? i think as an american it s really important to understand what these military families are doing for us. we all honor the service members. we can t tell them we re looking at the family members, and there are millions of them out there supporting our troops as the uso says, they re the force behind the forces. i developed such a better understanding of military families as a result of working on this book. elizabeth: can you share with us your favorite? do you have a favorite? i read about 20 of them so far, and they re all really incredibl ....
Her saying she doesn t know what nunes was talking about, that does warrant some further questioning, doesn t it? what i m taking issue with is people that making the slanderous accusation that she was taking intelligence or politicizing its or urging the intelligence agencies to surveil donald trump. i think that s nonsense as she pointed out. whether she has pertinent testimony or not, i can t say. if she does, we d be happy to have her come in. but at the same time, people that are saying that, you know, she s the typhoid mary of national security, that s grossly irresponsible to say those kind of things, particularly people who aren t privy to any of the information. so it s deeply disturbing when i see that kind of accusation lev level. all right. so at this point you don t know if suzanne rice is going to come before the committee? i m sure she will be invited, as will others. but again i think one point that ....