conduct immediately and sent a tweet that arguably exacerbated things? isn t that from a bluesability standpoint that the president plausibly agreed with the conduct of the people inside the capitol that day? does this comment or others give you any indication on how this judge will rule? you know, it s funny, aprila. it s hard to tell from a judge s comments because sometimes they are playing devil s advocate and sometimes they are just trying to probe what might be the weaknesses and the position that they might come down on the side of, but this judge is a reasonable judge, and it seems to me that he s going to be looking very carefully at these issues of what capacity was the president, former president acting in? was he acting as a candidate? was he acting in his own best personal interest, political interests versus the interests of the country, and the notion of him sitting there on his hands doing nothing while cheering on the insurrection suggests that the judge recognizes t
biggest risk of going there if prosecutors are not confident they can win? yes. so, aprila this, goes back, way back several crimes ago to the muller investigation and what he accumulated with regards to obstruction of justice and at the time there were 400 former federal prosecutors who said there was enough evidence at least on several of the ten dhunts were outlined in the muller report to prosecute trump and the reason that i think that this is super important is that obstruction of justice is sort of the building block of criminality for someone who occupies the oval office. if they can stop investigations, if they can thwart, you know, law enforcement looking into their misconduct, then basically they have a green light to do anything, and so i think that it s very important to move forward on that or at the very least i do think as the statute of limitations expires this year, starting in may, that the attorney general at least inform
available at your local retailer. ivanka trump is now being asked to talk with the january 6th committee as they learn more about her interactions with her father surrounding bun of the darkest days in america s democracy. cnn s paula reid joins us now with more on this. what are you learning, paula? aprila, this is a big move by the committee, really moving on the former president s innermost circle. now it s notable. this is a voluntary request for her cooperation. this is not a subpoena and, look, the committee has said they have been gathering evidence about what she was up to on january 6th. they say they are firsthand testimony that she asked her father at least tries to do something to stop the violence, but in this eight-page letter
shot, in the only are your antibody levels much higher, 25 times higher but also the durability of the vaccine, how long does the advantages open last? that protection is also much longer. it might even be like some of the other illnesses, aprila, where you get the booster shot and you may not neath need another shot for years or like a couple of years. we don t know, but really the bottom line, this is so reashufrmgt you get boosted and pretty much all parameters improve in terms of hospitalizations and breakthrough infections. doctor, thanks so much. good to have you here. i really appreciate it. thank. back to washington now. an annual anti-abortion march is just getting under way. these marchers are encouraged by recent court decisions. you just yesterday the court rejected another attempt to block the texas law that bans abortions starting at around six weeks of pregnancy, and the justices are still expected to soon rule on a case in mississippi that could deny women not jus
700-plus white house documents under wraps, means possible january 6th secheltons he wanted kept in closets. they will soon be in investigators hands. elie, how significant was that decision and what does that mean for the investigation now? so, it was a big deal on two levels, aprila, up, as you say, the investigators now have the document. the committee members have already started going through them. these are contemporaneous documents showing what people were wright, saying and doing as this attack happened. this is the most valuable kind of evidence because it s happened and it s created before nip has a chance to try to get their talking point or their stories straight. more broadly, legally speaking, these decisions, the federal court opinions from the federal court of appeals and yesterday from the supreme court really shoot down this idea that donald trump has had a legitimate claim of executive prif 11. the fact that they s a former president is not what s driving us here.