against new state efforts from coast-to-coast to further restrict abortion access. three conservative justices, the chief justice john roberts, justices brett kavanaugh, and amy coney barrett, sided with the court s three liberals in today s unusual ruling, but and it s a very important, but they did not settle the big legal question at issue whether federal guarantees i ve emergency medical care supersede idaho s effort to impose an almost total abortion ban. instead, today s decision dismiss the case on procedural grounds. the newest member of the court s liberal faction, justice ketanji brown jackson, warning this is far from over writing. this. today s decision is not a victory for pregnant patients in idaho. it his delay while this court donalds and the country waits, pregnant people experiencing emergency medical conditions remain in a precarious position. the ruling comes just hours before president biden and the former president donald trump debate right here at cnn s
On-cnn
Risk
Freiburg-sunday
Nine
Prices
Designers
Heart-racing
Guilt
Brands
Gilt-com
Flash-designer-sales
70
this and exploring it in depth and that the fbi shouldn t somehow have opened an investigation when they got wind of the fact that the russians were, what turned out to be running a full scale operation against our election, this seems like something whether people are interested or not, it does seem like something congress should be investigating and does seem like something the american people should be concerned about. i think the question is the timing, really. because there are a lot of people saying why couldn t they have gotten mueller sooner? i m one of them and i am one of them and i think there was a long negotiation of a time limit now that is sort of imposed by bob mueller while i ll give you three hours there and two hours there and pie question my quest he s up there, he can t just get up and leave if they are not done. i guess they technically could issue a subpoena for him. you raise on excellent point about this two bites at the apple question, can congress and
Investigation
Russia
Fact
Fbi
Election
Shouldn-t
Depth
Scale
Wind
People
Lot
Something
about this two bites at the apple question, can congress and should congress still be looking into it? republican haves been saying you don t get the president tweeted yesterday, you don t get two different bites at the apple. notice it s a different apple. congress has an investigative mandate and oversight and this is squarely both on the intelligence side and obstruction of justice side. squarely within what congress ought to be doing. they can walk and chew gum at the same time. they testified that the russians are still active and we have the president of the united states dismissing it as a hoax and as a witch hunt and you know this is deeply concerning. it should be. so mike, do you think the republicans on the committee do they try to interrupt the flow and get specific moments, five key moments and explain what
President
It
Congress
Republican
Haves
Bites
Apple-question
Apple
Two
Side
Both
Oversight
stay there. for 36 years he has been the unflappable anchor of evening newscasts. i m jim lehr in aware. chris: he as cam up with several theories. it s never about the moderator. you are talking about the moderator when it is over with. it is positively or negatively but in my opinion the moderator has failed. the key is to get them talking to each other. even when the rules prohibits he says there is another rule. no matter how fair you try to be. the moderator will always get criticized. you have a apple question for one, you better have a question for the other, too, some people are going to perceive you unfair no matter what.
Anchor
Evening-newscasts
Jim-lehr
36
Chris
Opinion
Moderator
Theories
Matter
Each-other
Rules
Rule
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.