news hello everyone. thanks for joining me. i m alison camera was triggered with less than four minutes until launch. the computer that launches the rocket stop the countdown clock now officials are racing to learn why both astronauts are now back at crew quarters after leaving the capsule, a short time ago joining us now from the kennedy space center is cnn space and defense correspondent kristin fisher so kristinn obviously this is not the news that nasa or boeing wanted today. what happened? we just don t know yet and we re going to find out hopefully quite a bit more during a press conference that nasa, boeing, and the united launch alliance have called, which is set to start in exactly one hour. now, all we know right now is that there was an issue with the ground launch sequencer and that is the computer that s responsible for launching this rocket. it s essentially an automated process. once you get down that close to lift off and there was some kind of problem wit
something that the appeals court would find sketchy somehow? i do think the overall architecture of the case are as you laid it out, would attract their attention. i don t know if it is not sketchy per say. i mean, they re going to need something to really potently potently argued front of the court because it is true that this is a unique case, but unique case does not necessarily mean it s a bad adwan or that, that ll be overturned there are novel fact patterns that require novel charging theories. now, there s a whole debate. obviously, that about whether or not this case should have been brought. but i want to set that to the side for these purposes because now the case has been brought and there is a verdict so you know, that sort of discretionary component is out the window now and i think that this is now down to legal brass tacks are going to need narrow, tight arguments that they could actually try to prevail upon. and i share the assessment that it is unlikely that they wil
pretty consistent all along, which seems to to be implying that no deal rarely is good enough for them until such time as hamas has been completely destroyed. and so although we seem to have a deal on paper that hamas is now reviewing the rhetoric that s coming out from the israeli government, from prime minister benjamin netanyahu. and one imagines the rhetoric that we will be getting out from hamas may suggest otherwise perhaps it will ultimately be open to interpretation, but certainly there are caused not just from the united states, from canada, from the french, from the british, from the european union, and other countries around the world saying that this is the deal that needs to be done. hamas needs to accept it so the hostages can be freed so that more humanitarian aid can go in palestinian prisoners released from israeli jails bells, and that there can be a ceasefire of at least six weeks, which will then pave the way for a permanent ceasefire and a total cessation of hostil