critical theory that talked about race and criminal justice that could address it. anyhoo, the rittenhouse case was influenced by the judge, who seemed to take quite a liking to mr. rittenhouse. he wouldn t let prosecutors call the people he gunned down victims and draw the names of the jurors to be dismissed so he would feel in control, because that s the luxury this young white man was afforded. it s one of many examples that outsized power judges hold. like the judge who decided last week to not send a convicted serial rapist who pleaded guilty to prison after praying about it. it s reminiscent of brock turner s 2017 sexual assault case where the judge gave him a life sentence because of the severe impact jail would have on him. we know for sure not all defendants are forwarded prayer and concern for their well being, with black men getting longer sentence for the exact same crime white men commit. as i mentioned earlier, it says something about our system that it was a shock to man
sam: i created a combat math game where the only way to beat the enemy is to out-fraction them. davy conquered every last denominator. my game was so successful, the principal is deploying it to math squadrons all over the school. rachel: wow! sam: anyhoo, how was your day? rachel: oh, uhh. today my boss treated the office to salad wraps. sam: mmm, salad wraps. rachel: i know.
president, trump was violating the emoluments clause of the constitution. remember when americans didn t even have to know that the emoluments clause of the constitution explicitly says the president can t profit from business dealings with foreign countries? remember those innocent days? when that was a totally irrelevant part of the constitution because presidents wouldn t even try such a thing? anyhoo, that case that was filed against the president on the first full work day of the trump presidency, that was the first of several cases ultimately brought by a bunch of plaintiffs trying to keep the president from using the oval office to line his pockets and trying to keep foreign governments from using trump branded properties as a convenient way to bribe the leader of the free world. that first emoluments case has appeared to be dead in the courts since a district court judge refused to let it go forward in 2017. but, hey, look. today an appeals court brought it back to life, which
remember those innocent days? when that was a totally irrelevant part of the constitution because presidents wouldn t even try such a thing? anyhoo, that case that was filed against the president on the first full work day of the president trump presidency, that was the first of several cases ultimately brought by a bunch of playoffs trying to keep the president from using the oval office as a convenient way to bribe the leader of the free world. that first emoluments case has appeared to be dead in the courts since a district court judge refused it to go in 2017. today an appeals court brought it back to life, which means, well, don t take it from me. our next guest tonight is deepak gupta, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs in this lawsuit against the presidential. mr. gupta, it s great to have you with us tonight. thanks for having me. i understand the basic charge here that the president s not supposed to use his public position to get rich and the constitution says in part
emoluments clause of the constitution explicitly says the president can t profit from business dealings with foreign countries? remember those innocent days? when that was a totally irrelevant part of the constitution because presidents wouldn t even try such a thing? anyhoo, that case that was filed against the president on the first full work day of the president trump presidency, that was the first of several cases ultimately brought by a bunch of playoffs trying to keep the president from using the oval office as a convenient way to fwrieb leader of the free world. that first emoluments case has appeared to be dead in the courts since a district court. yes, sir refused it to go in 2017. today an appeals court brought it back to life, which means, well, don t take it from me. our next guest tonight is deepak group at a, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs in this lawsuit against the presidential.