all of this comes on the heels of biden s first foreign trip abroad where the commander in chief and president ignore the ongoing crisis here at home while his borders are kamala harris ignores bipartisan calls to get down to the border and see the chaos firsthand. our full friday kicks off of karl rove, chris wallace and charlie gasparino coming up. i speak through but first a brand-new report, as top international scientist tell of a secret february 2020 teleconference where they discussed how covid could have started in that wuhan lab. hello, everyone, i m sandra smith in new york and this is america reports. and it s also friday. high, dom academic hi, teresa. trace: i m trace gallagher in for john roberts in los angeles. scientists on the call discussed the virus which some believe it to be engineered while others felt pointed to a natural origin. the group agreed information should be kept secret until they agreed upon the next steps. the conversation coming out i
the gatherings, where the rules and guidance had been broken. that he misled the house when he said on the 8th of december, 2021, that he relied on repeated assurances that the rules had not been broken. there is evidence that mrjohnson was assured, they say, by two individuals who had worked at number 10 at the time, and they did not think that the gatherings on the 18th of december had broken covid rules. but, however, the committee say they conclude boris johnson rules. but, however, the committee say they conclude borisjohnson had personal knowledge about the gatherings, which he should have disclosed, but he concedes there was no insurance about any gatherings compliance with the guidance in place at the time. and the purported assurances were only about a certain gatherings, not more generally about number 10 s compliance with the rules and guidance. yet they say borisjohnson rules and guidance. yet they say boris johnson gave rules and guidance. yet they say borisjohns
And the on. most notably during tech week and the sector of ai. in contrast, we know and the sector of ai. in contrast, we know idlib or s ai policies. anti investment, we know idlib or s ai policies. anti investment, anti infrastructure, anti innovation and anti individuals. labour s policies anti individuals. labour s policies. their worst top ten it failures policies. their worst top ten it failures cost half the school hudget failures cost half the school budget. they had free no childcare for under budget. they had free no childcare for under threes. they gifted us the fuel duty for under threes. they gifted us the fuel duty escalator and thought it acceptable that someone in his second acceptable that someone in his second job got to keep only 2p for every second job got to keep only 2p for every additional pound they earn. no labour every additional pound they earn. no labour government has ever left office labour government has ever left office with more
This, saying its anti investment. again, ithink this, saying its anti investment. again, i think it s going to help them with some of the backbenchers who might be sceptical about this idea who might not feel that this tax on company profits is quite the way they would want to see things done. i think those sort of elements they petting are there to try and calm those who perhaps are not ideological a. this is not what they would have chosen. they ve chanced they would have chosen. they ve changed their they would have chosen. they ve changed their position they would have chosen. they ve changed their position on - they would have chosen. they ve changed their position on the i changed their position on the council tax rebate, haven t they? sorry i lost the line there. they ve also changed sorry i lost the line there. they ve also changed their sorry i lost the line there. they ve also changed their position - sorry i lost the line there. they ve also changed their position on