goal. spend less and we achieved that coal. ~ . , spend less and we achieved that oal. ~ ., , , goal. was it everything i wanted? goal. was it everything i wanted? no. goal. was it everything i wanted? no. but- goal. was it everything i wanted? no. but sitting| goal. was it everything i - wanted? no. but sitting with one house, a democratic senate and a democratic president who didn t want to meet with us, i think we did pretty darn good for the american public. our north america correspondent nomia iqbal joins me from capitol hill. tell us about some of the reactions you have been hearing after this bill passed? after this bill passed? when the bill passed, after this bill passed? when the bill passed, there - after this bill passed? when the bill passed, there was i after this bill passed? when the bill passed, there was a | the bill passed, there was a sigh of relief in the chamber, certainly by the moderate democrats and republicans who were glad it finally cleared
this decision is a victory supporters of abortion rights, as it defends broad access to this pill, and for the biden administration. president biden has responded: with me is our correspondentjess parker. she has been looking into the story for us. what does this ruling mean? story for us. what does this ruling mean? access continues as it did before ruling mean? access continues as it did before two as it did before two mifepristone which, as you are saying, is widely used in america as part of a two drug regimen for abortion. just colbeck a little bit, there was a judge in texas who said that actually approval should be halted for the time being and then an appeals court basically ruled that went too far but looked to restrict access to mifepristone so you can only take it up to seven weeks of pregnancy, you couldn t ordered by mail, you had to go for an in person appointment. the supreme court has ruled for now none of those things will happen, axis remains as it was,
his thoughts on the us support for ukraine. it s great to have you on our show. today, the white house announced further aid to ukraine, munitions for patriot air defence systems, anti aircraft systems, ammunition and anti armour systems. i ammunition and anti-armour s stems. ~ ammunition and anti-armour system- systems. i think additional assistance systems. i think additional assistance is systems. i think additional assistance is certainly - assistance is certainly welcome, but you don t win a conflict by providing a laundry list of weapons and ammunition and the like. you do it by deciding your objectives and then marshalling the resources necessary to achieve those objectives. that is called strategy. instead, for 15 months or more, the us and nato have said, we are going to give this weapon system, that weapons system, and it has not contributed really to a coherent effort for ukraine to repel the russian aggression. we are about to start a spring offensive, we are all waiti
personal criticism . to germany now, where representatives from 50 countries have been meeting to discuss how they can give ukraine more support. the latest package includes ammunition for himars rocket systems, long range artillery, and anti armour weapons. earlier, i spoke to the us national security council spokesmanjohn kirby about the us position in ukraine. i want to start with an announcement we saw from the defence department saying that the abrams tanks that the us has promised to deliver to ukraine, that they will get to the battlefield this fall that is earlier than expected. do you think, however, that these tanks getting there earlier by the fall will still be enough? we are also providing hundreds of other vehicles and combined arms trading for battalions outside the country to get ready for the fighting. in the weeks and months ahead.