Program elements. We may have dialed it back a little too much on the local excuse me, on the lowincome customer component. And, so, were taking a look at that as Program Administrators at that. And then a quick shot of the tiered structure of the program. This what another one of the changes that we implemented in 1314 to make sure that we were not over inventing small systems within the statutory discretion we had ~ we went ahead and tiered the incentive structure based on the size of the systems. And then for areas of improvement, we flipping through to slide 15, you know, really want to make sure that we are improving access of the Program Benefit to not just to the pg e customers who reside and work in San Francisco, but also to the customers of the power enterprise. So that the fund leaving our side of the ledger are going to our customers as well as others. We want to make sure we have financing mechanisms for Program Participants because not everyone has access to financing the
Side of the ledger are going to our customers as well as others. We want to make sure we have financing mechanisms for Program Participants because not everyone has access to financing the balance of the system cost. We want to make sure were addressing that Going Forward, making sure were really optimizing longterm Job Opportunities for disadvantaged san franciscans, you know, working with Work Force Development folks. Were very happy to have this component of our program. But given the level of appropriationses and expenditures, 1. 5 million for this program, only 121 is employed is a fairly small number when you look at the dollars spent. And then we have a quick picture here i just have one comment on the areas of improvement. One thing id like to ask as an outcome of this hearing is youre obviously going to be presenting the budget to us in the coming weeks. Yes. I think it would be helpful if you could document for the public what areas what will you be able to improve in the com
The pucs power enterprise was balanced the last two. Previous to that it was not balanced and it showed a shortfall. But it did you point out that it is relatively straightforward if we dont have more revenues to pay for costs, we could only buy what we can afford to. So, here again now, we fast forward two years three new pieces of information mean costs even larger than what we have ever assumed. Mountain tunnel was already in last years capital plan [speaker not understood]. It was in it for the last several as far as the maintenance work, but it was in at 100 million of cost. With the potential for collapse of the mountain tunnel which would disrupt the water supply and a recently completed engineering study, though costs have gone upwards of 6 28 million ~. So, that, sir, is new, and i do understand that that would be a very surprising and large change. The Interconnection Agreement expiration, though costs have always been in our tenyear plan, but not to the recently filed and he
Power below cost, there just is not enough money to do all the things that are good and that we would want to do. And, so, the fiscal plan for the pucs power enterprise was balanced the last two. Previous to that it was not balanced and it showed a shortfall. But it did you point out that it is relatively straightforward if we dont have more revenues to pay for costs, we could only buy what we can afford to. So, here again now, we fast forward two years three new pieces of information mean costs even larger than what we have ever assumed. Mountain tunnel was already in last years capital plan [speaker not understood]. It was in it for the last several as far as the maintenance work, but it was in at 100 million of cost. With the potential for collapse of the mountain tunnel which would disrupt the water supply and a recently completed engineering study, though costs have gone upwards of 6 28 million ~. So, that, sir, is new, and i do understand that that would be a very surprising and
90 million, 30 million each from programs that we really want to do. But if we continue to provide power below cost, there just is not enough money to do all the things that are good and that we would want to do. And, so, the fiscal plan for the pucs power enterprise was balanced the last two. Previous to that it was not balanced and it showed a shortfall. But it did you point out that it is relatively straightforward if we dont have more revenues to pay for costs, we could only buy what we can afford to. So, here again now, we fast forward two years three new pieces of information mean costs even larger than what we have ever assumed. Mountain tunnel was already in last years capital plan [speaker not understood]. It was in it for the last several as far as the maintenance work, but it was in at 100 million of cost. With the potential for collapse of the mountain tunnel which would disrupt the water supply and a recently completed engineering study, though costs have gone upwards of 6