Harris Funeral Homes for six years until she told her boss she was going to live and identify as a woman. When harris homes responded by firing her, it discriminated against her because of her sex for three reasons. First, firing her for failing to conform to explicitly stated stereotypes about how men and women should behave. It discriminated against her in the same way as Price Waterhouse discriminated against anne hopkins for failing to walk and talk more feminine. It cannot be that anne hopkins would lose her case on the same facts. Second, harris fired her for identifying as a woman only because she was assigned male sex at birth. In doing so, they fired her for contravening a sex specific expectation that applies only to people assigned male sex at birth. Namely, that they live and identify as a man for their entire lives. That is disparate treatment on the basis of sex. Third, harris homes fired her for, and its owner words changing her sex. , that is discrimination in the same
First, firing her for failing to conform to explicitly stated stereotypes about how men and women should behave. It discriminated against her in the same way as Price Waterhouse discriminated against anne h opkins for failing to walk and talk more feminine. Pkinsnnot be that anne ho would lose her case on the same facts. Second, harris fired her for identifying as a woman only because she was assigned male sex at birth. In doing so, they fired her for contravening a sex specific expectation that applies only to people assigned male sex at birth. Namely, that they live and identify as amen for their entire lives. That is disparate treatment on the basis of sex. Herd, harris homes fired for, changing her sex. That is discrimination in the same way firing someone for changing their religion would be religious discrimination. That harris homes would fire transgender men for being insufficiently feminine and transgender women for being insufficiently masculine, is as the government concedes