Live Breaking News & Updates on Anita Hill Investigation
Stay updated with breaking news from Anita hill investigation. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The fbi investigation was a fair due process? i should use the word thorough. thorough due process? i think they are united. they have seen the democrats continually move the goal post from saying they want a public hearing, then an fbi investigation, just give us a week. it only took three base for the anita hill investigation. we gave them more than three days. they have treated dr. ford incredibly fairly and equi equitiably. where you do you think this has the biggest impact on strategy ahead of the miss terms one month from today? i m interested that kayleigh is so confident that american women are behind judge kavanaugh in this matter. i think american women, the majority of them would beg to differ. are some women behind him? yes, but it s a distinct minority. this is a very painful and ....
That is now over judge kavanaugh so that if he is confirmed tld is faith he s going to be a good justice, that he deserves to be there. and that is where i think julie swetnick comes in. does she does failing to interview her make some americans feel like they didn t do a full job and the cloud has not been lifted? i want to ask you, and trust me, i understand the political position you have been put in here. set that aside if we can for a moment, if that s possible in this environment, but let s say this was another nominee on another day in a different political environment. if you had done a background check on someone and then a new witness came forward and alleged behavior, even years before, would you reopen that background check? absolutely. and i would say, and i don t know because i m not running the investigation, but i will tell you, i would be shocked if they didn t contact her, see if she would be granted a but they re being guided, the parameters, by the white h ....
Teenage girl when he was a teen himself in the early 1980s and later exposed himself to a classmate while a college student at yale. sources tell cnn at the white house, not the fbi is deciding exactly what investigators can and cannot look into for the purposes of this investigation. and whom they can or cannot question. right. what will the scope of this be? we ll see. not being questioned so far, as we know, is the former college friend who put out a scathing statement overnight. a statement that accuses judge kavanaugh of a, quote, blatant mischaracterization of his drinking at yale. a mischaracterization was done under oath, by the way. back at the white house, president trump is hailing a last-second breakthrough in trade talks with canada and mexico, a new deal to replace nafta. he will tout it one hour from now in the rose garden. remember, this was a key, key promise of the president on the campaign trail, and he has followed through. let s bedgin, though, with the battle ov ....
The criticism you ll hear from republicans in the wake of this is that, listen, the fbi never reaches conclusions. it only makes it only does what are called 302s, they issue these reports and leaved it up to the appointing body to make the decision on that. is that actually a justification to dismiss the reports? or is that just not the way it is and always has been? that s the way the background checks work. that s exactly right. the point is to give the senators enough information that they can make a proper judgment. and they just didn t have enough information because the senators on the committee were not able to get together and do a proper investigation as they should have if there was bipartisan communication. meaning to talk to some people involved, to cross-examine witnesses. good if they had done the investigation the way they should have, spoken to all the witnesses, brought the ones in for testimony who needed to testify, followed up on leads, i don t think they wou ....
Focused on the request of manchin, murkowski, collins, flake, is what they want answered in the scope. let me ask you this. just in terms of fairness, to take off the administration had just for a moment, it s an fbi investigation. they re experienced in doing background checks. why would it be the white house or senate republicans who set the outlines? shouldn t they hand it over to the fbi and say, listen, we trust you with this. you re experienced in this. you guys decide how far this should go? i think, jim, we re forgetting that actually brett kavanaugh has gone through six different fbi background checks that are quite expansive. they go back and ask neighbors of all the places you lived about karth, about what you have done, what you haven t done. i think we re overlooking that. the reality is this is a he said/she said. there s plenty of questions about witnesses that dr. ford has alleged were there who basically deny ever being there. i think though the senate republicans ....