Louisiana trials. But we need to place this into perspective. This laudable ruling would only apply to cases then pending or recent will i adjudicated. It meant nothing to mr mr. Edwards, the only place that would jail you for life on a nonunanimous verdict. Why should the 6th amendment mean something less to mr. Edwards. Members of the ramos court were divided how to reconcile the fractured decision with then existing precedent. This cleared two paths that ramos, two paths to remedy those jailed by a jury scheme we know was morally wrong at its i think so tension and is unconstitutional. For some, apdoca was dead on arrival. And with these, they provided no value and ramos is an old rule dictated by precedent that simply restored the 6th amendments full measure either through the due process clause or privileges or immunities clause of the 14th amendment. For other justices. Apadoca was such a wrong decision, it needed to be overruled. And this restores fairness to jury trials in loui
Louisianas nonunanimous jury. On paper with a full breath of the jury trial right but the ruling needs to be put into perspective this ruling the ending or adjudicated it meant nothing to serving a life sentence for work that would be illegal everywhere else but louisianas only place that would you for life on a nonunanimous verdict. The question before the court is why should the fifth amendment mean something less us members of the court were divided on how to reconcile the fracture decision this had clear as to have a remedy for those of the jury scheme that was morally wrong at its inception and unconstitutional. They havent no president ial value this is an old rule and an accident for the six amendment full measure with the due process clause or the privileges or immunities clause of the 14th amendment. With such a long a decision to be explicitly for those members of the court should be a watershed and restores for fairness and accuracy to the jury trials in louisiana. And those
Louisianas nonunanimous jury. On paper with a full breath of the jury trial right but the ruling needs to be put into perspective this ruling the ending or adjudicated it meant nothing to serving a life sentence for work that would be illegal everywhere else but louisianas only place that would you for life on a nonunanimous verdict. The question before the court is why should the fifth amendment mean something less us members of the court were divided on how to reconcile the fracture decision this had clear as to have a remedy for those of the jury scheme that was morally wrong at its inception and unconstitutional. They havent no president ial value this is an old rule and an accident for the six amendment full measure with the due process clause or the privileges or immunities clause of the 14th amendment. With such a long a decision to be explicitly for those members of the court should be a watershed and restores for fairness and accuracy to the jury trials in louisiana. And those
Provided this video. We are at the 75th anniversary of the potsdam conference. Big numbers like the 75th anniversary or hundred anniversary, are always occasions for looking back and for drawing attention. I think there is another reason to look back at potsdam as we are in our own day and age, reentering a world of Great Power Competition and reentering a world where geopolitics seems to have come back to the fore of international thinking in International Relations thinking. So it is well worth us coming back to this subject. Im especially glad to have a chance to talk to you about it. I wish it was in person again, in kansas city. I wish that we were able to do this face to face, but we will do the very best that we can. The key thing here, that i want to return to throughout this presentation, is shown by this photograph here, of Winston Churchill, harry truman and Joseph Stalin smiling and shaking hands. And the point that i really want to reiterate here, is that these three men a
Community of brighton each, in brooklyn. A beautiful place right on the beach. Long island sound. Many poor russians lived there in those days. , we were veryhad poor. My father was a restaurant worker all his life. What did your mom do . Ben my mother worked in the garment industry, so she will take the subway downtown from the bronx every morning to work. My father worked in a cafeterias. My sister and i roslyn i were left more or less alone most of our lives. I was pretty much left alone most of the time i was growing. Growing up. Ut that was fine, i loved it in the bronx, where we lived in the bronx park, a wonderful place, the bronx zoo, a Botanical Gardens that i used to go to all the time, i use to sneak into the bronx zoo overnight to see the animals after it had closed. I had no planes at all. We had a great time being poor. Better, beach was even right next to coney island. I could go to coney island, ride on the cyclone, get hot dogs and at nathans. I was a pretty lucky kid.