Know him pretty well is the putin of 2000 different from the putin of today thats a great question my answer is yes and no putin was antidemocratic that year he was not like that from the beginning, i wrote my first article about putin in 2000, warning the world about his antidemocratic actions. He has always been an imperialist , he paid for the collapse of the soviet union. His life defending the soviet empire, but 20 years ago he was much more promarket and prowestern about market reforms, he lowered the individual income tax and moved russia to a flat tax of 13 , he lowered corporate taxes and respected private property, not so much, he restored the strict stroi states over the economy, especially after the invasion of your country for the second time. Once he was open to interaction with the west. He even talked about russia joining nato. By the way, let me remind you that today he says that in everything you are not nato and he was forced to invade ukraine due to the expansion of
Was with her father, mother and younger sister in severynivka, this is the buchan district of kyiv region, and in the first days of the war it was more or less calm there, so the family decided to stay in the village and not return to the capital where rockets had already arrived and in early march, when the buchan district was already full of occupiers in severynivka, and not only did enemy artillery begin to fly, of course people were hiding in basements, but it is hardly possible to say that it was safe there, so i can imagine with horror the feelings of arina, her nine sevenyearold sister, the main thing was the parents, who perfectly understood that it was impossible to stay, but it was also very dangerous to run away, look at severynivka, in order to leave for the south, no matter how hard it was, you had to jump out onto the zhytomyr highway and only then turn to motyzhyn or kopyliv. At that time , the road was already full of enemy vehicles, the situation was deadlocked, and th
Ukraine, but also for the whole world, because together with the condemnation of the terrorist regime of putin , the world, and the orthodox world, must also give an assessment to the Russian Orthodox church and its head, patriarch gundyaev, because you cannot change concepts, you cannot say white for black , cannot be constantly manipulated. And use faith as a tool, one of the tools for the destruction of the ukrainian people. Another tool that is quite actively used by the russians in the fight against the ukrainians, it is the telegram messenger, which was created by former russians, however, there are no former russians, i do not believe that there are former russians, and this was confirmed by. The head of the Main Intelligence Department of the ministry of defense, Kyrylo Budanov , who spoke during the kyivstatcom forum, and he said that the Telegram Network in many ways has a destructive effect inside the country, but at the same time it allows information to be delivered to peo
A complete repetition of the actions of the peoples republic of china in the south china sea, when chinese Border Guards search there with philippine ships and vessels, creating it the danger of catastrophe or sea accidents, well, the chinese did not invent it, it was invented by the russians, it is the first such incident. Was in the black sea in 1986, when, guided by the article on the right of peaceful passage of the then new convention, of the 1982 International Maritime convention, two american ships decided to pass along the crimean coast, a section of the crimean coast in the faros area. So the russians and the soviet leadership at that time expected such actions, and two soviet ships were sent to intercept them, the skr bezzavetnyi, the smaller skr, skr, under the leadership of the then captain of the first rank budanov, and thats when the russians first used that tactic, battles by the sides. There were two warships, well, thats a lot, you can imagine what they are, what their
Almost everyone forgot about these exercises, but on the 21st, the enemy announced that he was conducting such exercises in the first phase, and this is rather an ideological response of our enemy to make impossible all processes that primarily concern good dynamics , connected with the fact that, in particular there, american congressmen are already turning to the pentagon with. Or is it still there with a request to make a decision on the use of american weapons in order to strike on the territory of the Russian Federation, especially when we are talking about the accumulation of enemy manpower there in the belgorod, kursk or bryansk regions , as it was, in particular, on the eve of the russian offensive on the northern kharkiv region, if, conditionally speaking, there was an opportunity to strike with the same atakams that have already been transferred to ukraine, then of such an offensive potential. Of course there was no enemy, so, relatively speaking, congressmen are turning to t