About how this pandemic started. Done an exhaustive search. China could provide evidence that would be exculpatory here. They have refused to do that and the Home Of The Brave [cheers and applause] Kyle Larson wins the cocacola 600. All gave some some gave all some true for the red, white, and blue some had to fall will good Morning And Welcome to Fox Friends on this monday, Memorial Day, 2021. We hope youve had a wonderful weekend. Hope you fired up the barbecue. Hope you hung out with friend, family and the community and we hope you remember as well. Remember the meaning of this day, the meaning behind this day as we are honoring those who made the ultimate sacrifice for our free dome. As we have done so all weekend long, we have been asking you to send in your photos of those you remember, your friends, your family, your Loved Ones who gave the ultimate sacrifice so that we can all remember together on this Memorial Day. Send them in at friends foxnews. Com. Rachel thank you, will.
Followed by california garamendi. Ive john later, former Small Business administrator karen mills talks about her new book on how technology is impacting Small Businesses. Host it is the washington journal for may 14. A cofounder of Facebook Says it is time for the federal government to break up the company over concerns of its size and influence. Several democratic lawmakers running for president expressing the same sentiment. What about you . Is this something the government should be involved in if you support the idea of the government . Breaking up these Companies Involved in facebook, 2027488000. If you oppose the approach, 2027488001. You can tell us why on the phone and on our twitter feed at cspanwj, and on our Facebook Page. This past sunday, a piece by chris hughes, cofounder of facebook, taking a look at the size and influence of the social media company, writing a piece saying it is time to break up facebook. More on that in a bit. Within the story, a graphic which shows t
sue and edgar wachenheim, iii. barbara hope zuckerberg. corporate funding is provided by mutual of america designing customized individual and group retirement products. that s why we are your retirement company. additional support has been provided by:ompany. and by the corporation for public broadcasting, and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. from the tisch wnet studios at lincoln center in new york, hari sreenivasan. this is pbs newshour weekend. brangham: good evening, and thanks for joining us. there is no relief in sight along the flood-ravaged gulf coast of louisiana and mississippi today. the national weather service has extended flood watches for parts of southeastern louisiana through this evening, following three days of relentless rainfall that sent many rivers flowing over their banks. forecasters say more than 20 inches have fallen over the last few days. what louisiana governor john bel edwards calls historic and unpre
to the extent there are positive real subsidies to the except that they improve outcomes, they are either very localize to the family or very localized to the community in question. you work on capitol hill. i worked there for a number of years. every other person who comes here in the door says it s a great thing if you gave a subsidy for their industry and how many jobs they create. that s what shopped around. they are grossly skabexaggerate. let s think about housing for a second. we all need a place to live. an apartment building is not all that different than a condo. it actually takes the same amount of construction workers. there s nothing specific about the tenure that increases jobs. again, we all have to live somewhere. i think you should be skeptical of those job arguments that you often here. the chart you re looking at here is the lower bar that s the fannie and freddie market share. we hit long term homeownership rates in this country in 1960. the growth of fann
self-interest and they are dressing it up in a data protection guys, and the only thing that i have ever discovered that they understand is the threat of retaliation, if they go beyond the legal bounds that they have set. that are set by international trade law. and the u.s. and the u.s. congress has been reluctant to stand up for companies and say, if you get hit with a case, an enforcement matter in the european union, based on a theory that goes beyond international rules, we ll allow you to file a lawsuit here and collect the money back. in fact, you can auction off the embassy of the country that sues you. we could do a lot to make it clear that we re tired of this one-sided debate in which we demand and they give a live, and we give a little more. because they are threatening to hurt our industry. it s the wrong approach. we need to get much more tough minded. if i could add to that, i agree with the questioner in the main, but i also agree with stu. in the sense of,