Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. This is a confusion and an unelected judge trying to supersede and impose his values over the president. Thats what the census is for, to count the people in the country. Laura theyre counting all people. Count the immigrants. Laura hold on, scott. Theyre counting all people. Theres a question about whether youre a citizen or not. Now, what is the problem with answering the question . I dont understand that. What is the possible constitutional argument here . Well, because its racially offensive, first of all. Laura what does it have to do with race . Its directed at brown people and black people. Laura youre making that up. Of course it is. Laura its directed at all people in the country. You ask a question. I get asked the question. You get asked the question. We got another case. Does that mean ill right . Laura out of portland involvin
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. Census. Up until 1950, we did have it on the census. The census changes and we didnt ask that question. Tell us about the posture of this case and this police judge, jesse furman. Laura what is happening here is that these judges are, you know, taking these cases and imposing their own judicial philosophy and new standards that are not written into the law into these cases. You saw the exact same reasoning that judge furman used here, which is that wilbur ross, in charge of the census in his department, had made some remarks about the reasoning behind wanting to count citizens that raised an issue of animus. Well the United States Supreme Court recently ruled that this Animus Theory is bogus and one of the elements that shouldnt be applied. Clarence thomas has spoken out on nationwide injunctions. So basically, this is a
confusion and we h
laura: and sessions says look, this is just the tip of the iceberg. $250,000 just in boston. yes. why don t we give these folks a reason to come out of the shadows and identify themselves so we can separate the ones t t that they don t we have no incentive to find out who they are. they re sitting out there using your social security number and my social security number. ice can only do what congress tells it to do. ice is dependent on the ina law. congress is blaming ice. both parties are blaming ice and dhs for the failure to act for the last laura: we re not failing to act. be very clear about that. sessions is not failing to act. i interviewed andrew lulling today on the radio. congress. laura: there is great enforcement going on. michael, you can speak to this. sure. francisco
and you and i have been laura: and sessions says, look, this is just the tip of the iceberg. it is. why don t we give these folks a reason to come out of the shadows and identify themselves so we can separate the ones that want to from the ones that want to harm us. they won t. we have no incentive to find out who they are. they re sitting out there using your social security number and my social security number. i.c.e. can only do what congress tells it to do. i.c.e. is dependent on the ina law. congress is blaming i.c.e. both parties are blaming i.c.e. and dhs for their failure to act laura: we re not failing to act. be very clear about that. sessions is not failing to act. i interviewed andrew lulling today on the radio. congress. laura: there is great enforcement going on. michael, you can speak to this. sure. francisco laura: they re mapping out