work before 3:30 in the afternoon. we are on the air force schedule now. [laughter] many of you know congressman gallagher from wisconsin, member of the house armed services committee and now the house select committee on intelligence. also a writer and thinker on all the things we are talking about today, so grateful to have him talk about the things we are talking about today. we were just reminiscing outside about two seminal events that happened in this room, in the press club. i want to start with deterrence and integrated deterrence. we heard from our first panel about the need for the u.s. to be engaged and engaged in muscular fashion in the world not reckless, not imprudent, but leading, the definition that leadership requires that you generate fellowship. then we heard from the last panel that you need the wherewithal. the wherewithal for deterrents. the new administration has a concept called integrated deterrence. you wrote a panel about it in the washingto
intelligence. also a writer and thinker on all the things we are talking about today, so grateful to have him talk about the things we are talking about today. we were just reminiscing outside about two seminal events that happened in this room, in the press club. i want to start with deterrence and integrated deterrence. we heard from our first panel about the need for the u.s. to be engaged and engaged in muscular fashion in the world not reckless, not imprudent, but leading, the definition that leadership requires that you generate fellowship. then we heard from the last panel that you need the wherewithal. the wherewithal for deterrents. the new administration has a concept called integrated deterrence. you wrote a panel about it in the washington post. is it unfair to describe your op-ed saying that integrated deterrence seems just like a slogan and not a real policy? how would you describe it? do we have enough wherewithal to deter the aggression we need to deter to p
wisconsin, member of the house armed services committee and now the house select committee on intelligence. also a writer and thinker on all the things we are talking about today, so grateful to have him talk about the things we are talking about today. we were just reminiscing outside about two seminal events that happened in this room, in the press club. i want to start with deterrence and integrated deterrence. we heard from our first panel about the need for the u.s. to be engaged and engaged in muscular fashion in the world not reckless, not imprudent, but leading, the definition that leadership requires that you generate fellowship. then we heard from the last panel that you need the wherewithal. the wherewithal for deterrents. the new administration has a concept called integrated deterrence. you wrote a panel about it in the washington post. is it unfair to describe your op-ed saying that integrated deterrence seems just like a slogan and not a real policy? how woul