washington. glad to have you. here right now in south carolina, there are major developments in alex murdaugh s double murder trial. the prosecution now respond ing after the defense presented its closing arguments yesterday. defense attorney jim griffin made an emotional plea when wrapping up his presentation. there are two words that justice demands this thises case and those two words are not guilty. the oath you have taken in this case it requires a verdict not dwlt. on behalf of alex, of buster, on behalf of maggie and on behalf of my friend paul, i respectfully request that you do not compound a family tragedy with another thank you. just before closing arguments began, the judge remove d a jurr for discussing the case outside of the trial. diane gallagher is outside of the court in south carolina. diane, what more did the defense say today as they were presenting to the jury in these final hours of this trial? reporter: jim griffin spoke for about 2 hours and 15
victims in an alleged plot to kill, quote, anyone that is jewish in the michigan government. those words are from a man now in federal custody according to an affidavit. his first court appearance was wednesday on charges of making charges along state lines. and has tweeted the fbi has confirmed i was a target of the heavily armed defendant in this matter. it s my hope that they take this just as seriously as the federal authorities takes the offense just as seriously as my hate crimes and domestic terrorism unit takes plots to murder elected officials. he has three handguns and one that is an mia military-style weapon, polo sandoval has more. what have we learned? we actually see on the page, linked to jack and jane carpenter ii, the suspect in the case. and not just anti-semitic and quite alarming especially this tweet that federal investigators saw back in february, february 17th to be exact. and what he allegedly wrote, including, quote, he would carry out death to an
Can give and take. they ve got memories for it but also they suffered for it, because let s not forget with the british press around the world how much they were criticized for the $2.2 million to renovate it. it was crown property, it was crown property that was renovated and harry and meghan profited from that and now it s been taken from them. and i have to ask you about prince andrew of it all, he is facing so many scandals. do you think it s wise to have the optics of that to move harry and meghan out for speaking out, and move prince andrew in? i think that charles wants andrew out of the royal fold. he wants him out of this giant royal lodge. we understand that andrew does not want to move. he is going to resist it. he does not want to go to frogmore cottage, andrew very grand, he probably think it s
They ve been asked to vacate frogmore cottage, the five-bedroom home that the queen gave to them. on their royal wedding. kate from those not on the inside to the outside, this kind of looks like retaliation after this tell-all period for both harry and meghan. what do you think it is? well, abby, we can hear initially that the movement ford evicting harry and meghan from frogmore cottage happened not long after the publication of spare back in january. and it seems that the king has may the decision that it s not their home anymore. sources say they re distressed. that they consider it their house. it looks like what the king is moving around, moving everyone around. prince andrew, a disgraced member of the royal family has a large property at windsor castle. it has a swimming pool, very