Citizens and people participating in the democratic government and we have the ability can to control the use of these technologies. One of these tests is whether we can safeguard privacy. I agree with that. Effectively i think that if we dont acknowledge the fact that everything that a machine has access to, we have just compromised it. Everyone sees this and they give them a nickel or a penny and they want to pay him to do his work for him and that is what we are doing with our content on the internet. And so he we are trying to build mousetraps versus those that catch our tail at the time. And we will have a much more productive relationship. Please had out there to get the book, thank you so much and we certainly appr youre watching booktv, television for serious redders. Readers. You can watch any program you see here online at booktv. Org. Andrew coburn looks at the rise of drones. During this event he reads transcripts from actual drone strikes and describes the role of the diff
Several nato allies provide for instance training and support to ukraine. I think there is a european challenge a global challenge, and a chance in which nato is addressing. When it comes to article five the important thing is that nato stand ready to protect and defend our rights against any threat. And for instance cyber threats, important thing we did as the lost gate, was to decide that Cyber Attacks can trigger article five; collective defense. Because regarding cyber as dangerous as a conventional attack is important. And therefore we are developing our capabilities to respond. Partly to the tech who is behind our main responsibility is to defend our own nato networks with teams, capabilities, exercises and so we are increasing our readiness for cyber defense. And we are also developing their own capabilities through cyber attempts. And as always, every attack is there but we ought to trust that nato will respond to the correct way, if and when needed whatever kind of attack we a
Ongoing base dis 49. We give them affordable nutrition, the food bill on down is designed around cheap calories and expensive nutrients. Highfructose corn syrup and everything else. It is tough to find ways to have a sustainable system designed around affordable nutrition. So it was designed about the idea we can help try to recover some of this wasted food. By the way sasha and emily heard me say this before, i actually think we would all do ourselves a favor anyone in this fight, never using the word food waste again. Because food waste is, food is modifier of what type of waste is it. This is something sanitation departments are designed to handle. They do a good job of it. No one in america want as second helping of food waste, no one. If you take the two words and flip them, nobody in america thinks it is a good idea to waste food. This is excess. Lettuce the wrong size. Food that is at its sellby date but has another two weeks or week or more. Honey, et cetera that are at its sel
We are glad you are here again and my hope is that you will take some time to spend some time in the galleries and spend time with the pack in the memorial. In the National Museum for world war i the memorial was honored in december of 2014. Its honored by both the United States National Museum and memorial. Its in the prestige that comes from the Congress Actually passed something. [laughter] that might be the most distinguished action of the bicameral bipartisan bill. We are also pleased to welcome the speaking union and are grateful for the generous support for the fund of the project. Im especially pleased to English Speaking union cosponsors on a 60kilometer by craig on sunday when i stopped at a break at a school where we were having a drink one of the students asked me if they spoke british and australian. [laughter] then it was 100 years ago the world was forever changed by the catastrophe of the 21st century world war i and we lived in the shadow experiencing its effect to thi
No big deal. We are going to enforce equal pay laws. We would not say i have a religious objection to pay minimum wage. No big deal. The government can make up the salary difference. Let alone saying i refuse to fill out a form. The question about the Conscientious Objector was absolutely right. Notre dames lawyer todd is does that mean it would be a substantial burden on religious exercise . And he said yes. Even that would have to be considered a substantial burden. And that is all well and good. When someone else is losing an important benefit as a results come and that is when the has to be balance. The idea that i am entitled every possible idiosyncrasy in my beliefs is fine but as a result of those other peoples benefits that is when it crosses the line. We are going to leave it there. Clearly not something we will be able to resolve. Lets try to find areas where both sides may agree more. The most recent example that i think i have looked at is the hold against house case. Maybe