I will introduce you to the panelists in just a moment. Two highprofile scholars reduced similar arguments about the history of u. S. Foreignpolicy. Both contend that a distance with great and troubling consequences exist between the foreignpolicy elites, the antimoral military machine, and the american people. Both assigned a good deal of influence to particular members of that elite, to demonstrate how u. S. Foreignpolicy not merely advances the interests of an elites, but how such. Nfluence because anderson did not do much digging in archives to sustain his argument, he assigns an inordinate amount of influence to an elite he obviously despises. Nonetheless, the reception of his work, even when negative, suggest theres a genuine desire among scholars for discussion, if not arguments about the domestic context and ethical applications of american foreignpolicy. Nothing betteres or genuinely realistic analysis of american foreignpolicy. When he offers her declarations ,hat are the dom