Cspan. Org history. And we would like to tell you about some of our other American History tv programs. Be with us every saturday 8 00 p. M. And 12 00 a. M. With lectures in history. Hear lectures on topics ranging from the American Revolution to the 9 11 terrorist attacks. Thats lectures in history, every saturday at 8 00 p. M. And 12 00 a. M. Eastern here on American History tv on cspan3. Up next on American History tv, history professor Lea Vandervelde talking about the Supreme Court case of 1857. Dread scott was a slave attempted to sue his owner for his familys freedom after they were moved to a free state by their former master. The court ruled that slave or free blacks could not sue in federal court because they could not be u. S. Citizens. Professor is vandervelde talks about the repercussions of the decision and why its location in missouri was important. Here is the introduction. The Supreme Court Historical Society hosted this hourlong event. Good evening. I am glad to be he
Good evening. I am glad to be here with you for the first lecture in the Supreme Court Historical Societys series, this Supreme Court and the civil war revisited. The timing is just right, for this year marks the 150th anniversary of the war between the states. A bit about the society which i joined many years before i got this good job. And i remain among the legions of supporters of the societys many endeavors. Some of them dorothy mentioned. This society has been a key player in improving public understanding of the court and its role in the constitutional framework of our government. Regular attendees of these lectures know how engaging they have been. And i appreciate, too, Something Else dorothy mentioned. The societys preening program for high schoolteachers and the books produced by the society are works well conceived and good to read. Among my favorites, claire cushmans court watches, eyewitness accounts in Supreme Court history. It is a collection of welltold anecdotes about
Youre part of one where were trying to convince those High School Students that they better understand this and they should understand its history and they should how it relates to democracy, human rights, et cetera, rule of law, because if they dont understand it, they wont have it. Thats the connection between the courthouse, the judiciary committee, the judiciary itself and the document that you want to talk about which im delighted to let you talk about. One or two more questions that are always people ask, i assume you. When you got on the Supreme Court, appointed by president clinton, when you had your interview with him, famously you had been injured, unfortunately, in a bicycle accident and then you kind of get out of the hospital to go to the interview or wasnt that kind of awkward to go do an interview when you were not in such good shape, you had broken some bones . I dont know. I cant remember. All right. So you get on the court. You get on the Supreme Court and when youre
Evening will be rebroadcast saturday night at 8 00 p. M. Eastern time on booktv on cspan2. This weekend booktv is live in florida for the Miami Book Fair international. Coverage kicking off saturday at 10 00 a. M. Eastern on cspan two cspan2. Coming up on c span two tonight debate on the Sexual Assault in the military. Then the Georgetown Law Center exam congressional proposal to change nsa surveillance programs. Thats followed by a hearing examining how security clearances are granted. On the next washington journal, pennsylvania congressman discusses the health care law. The senate this week is working on the 2014 Defense Program bill. Senator kristin jill brands amendment would remove decision on Sexual Assault prosecutions from military commanders and give them to military lawyers. Senator Claire Mccaskill decision keep them with the military chain of command but add more oversight responsibilities to the chief. In this hour, the two senators describe their positions. T . The presi
These consequences. They include but are not limited to loss or restriction of professional licenses, ineligibility for public funds including Public Welfare benefits, Public Housing, and student loans, loss of voting rights, ineligibility for jury duty, and a big one in colorado is loss of hunting privileges. And deportation of immigrants. While collateral consequences have always accompanied criminal convictions in the United States, their number in impact expanded dramatically during the 1980s and 1990s. Collateral consequences have recently garnered increased attention in if large part because of the Record Number of individuals now exiting u. S. Correctional facilities and returning to communities across the country. The numerous collateral consequences that attached to convictions are perceived as frustrating reintegration for both individuals and for communities. Many maintain that collateral consequences are a barrier to successful reentry for many offenders. While many nations