that sort of escapes my understanding. but they really did believe it might come to that, that the president would call upon them. but i m sorry. i want to get to your opinion but i also want to focus on what they re saying. who told them to provide security? are they acting under the direction of someone in particular or were they volunteering and presuming to provide it in some way? were they instructed? they were volunteers, but they were asked, originally by ali alexander s event planning firm, to come to one of event and then they were redirected over to the ellipse for the women for america first rally. and they were there, and, you know, their role was to escort people through the crowd, provide medical support, that sort of thing. i know you can t see me, jonathan, i m frowning a little bit, i want to tell you why i m furrowing my brow the way i am.
security? are they acting under the direction of someone in particular or were they volunteering and presuming to provide it in some way? were they instructed? they were volunteers, but they were asked, originally about ali alexander s event planning firm, to come to one of event and then they were redirected over to the ellipse for the women for america first rally. and they were there, and, you know, their role was to escort people through the crowd, provide medical support, that sort of thing. i know you can t see me, jonathan, i m frowning a little bit, i want to tell you why i m furrowing my brow the way i am. i m having a hard time believing the notion, just from seeing what the indictment says and some of the documents, that they believed they were only there to provide security, because if you re looking at the oath keepers own words, right, you ve got january 6th, after trump was speaking, which by the way might inure to the benefit of donald trump, all i see trump