not switched on yet. we can go back now to daniel sanford who can explain to us just the process behind these cameras being switched on, when and where that happens. having done the experimentation, the appeal court in the supreme court, the decision was made eventually last year, that we should go back and start thinking about whether there should be cameras allowed in there should be cameras allowed in the criminal courts, the crown courts, the place where the most serious cases are heard. and so eventually a decision was made. that yes, cameras should be allowed in court but only for that very last bit of the process, the final bit for thejudge passed bit of the process, the final bit for the judge passed sentence. bit of the process, the final bit for thejudge passed sentence. no cameras for the evidence, witnesses, lawyers making their arguments in court and no cameras for any of those victim impact statements that are going on at the moment at manchester crown court, bu
this on three peoples lives, which will stay with them forever. find will stay with them forever. and ust for will stay with them forever. and just for peeple will stay with them forever. and just for people joining us recently, just for peoplejoining us recently, rowan, you have been talking us through the impact statements, but just a little recap of what people just a little recap of what people just tuning in on what we are expecting to happen and what we are waiting for. expecting to happen and what we are waitin: for. ~ . ., expecting to happen and what we are waitin: for. ~ . . . expecting to happen and what we are waitin for. . ., . . . waiting for. what we are hearing at the moment waiting for. what we are hearing at the moment is waiting for. what we are hearing at the moment is victim waiting for. what we are hearing at the moment is victim impact - the moment is victim impact statements from 0livia pratt korbel s family about the impact that her mother murder h