curtailed. that is the problem. there is a velocity issue. it is an algorithm issue. roger, you talk about this all the time. the people who put in free speech context are muddying the water here. twitter does not have a first amendment problem. no one has told twitter to do anything. although, in europe they are starting to come up with regulation that is causing social media companies to have to moderate some of their content. that is not what elon musk is doing. he hung his hat on something else here. i think you think it is the wrong thing. yes, ali, i think the fundamental problem here is that twitter is the place where politicians, and journalists, builds their brands and spread their messages. it has a disproportionate, and punches way above its weight. it is less than tenth the size of facebook or google. and yet, because that is where
protected, verified accounts like donald trump and other figures close to him were the source of a lot of this misinformation about voter fraud. look, it s the amplification that is the problem, right? and there is only this is not a human issue. this is an algorithm issue. so and it seems as if facebook just continues to refuse to accept that their business model actually encourages more of this, it does not discourage it. right. as we know now from facebook s own research papers, this is something their own employees, their own researchers, academics who have been hired by the company, have said to executives over and over again. if you really want to solve the problem, you have to look at what the algorithm is amplifying. facebook knows it can do this because just around the november elections in 2020, it shifted its algorithm to favor legitimate news sources. i use that word legitimate carefully because it was news
Как не дать злоумышленникам повысить привилегии в системе после успешного заражения securitylab.ru - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from securitylab.ru Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
what s happening. kimberly: you are invited to facebook. dana: for something different but it s also an algorithm issue. the accusation was they were suppressing conservative news. to that point, eric, would you think apple and google should comply with the federal government and its requests for information when they are trying to track down terrorists? eric: no. no, no. i think the privacy issue is constitutional and should stay intact with regards to that. the situation where there is the san bernardino phone. the feds wanted in. i think that s the right decision. my point is when you see a massive rush of viewership into a facebook live program, upload going on, maybe have some way, some algorithm, a red flag and have someone at facebook say, what s going on that is causing so much activity? or its illegal, shut it down.