things related i think the best way to say it people have a right to speak out and pick the person of their choice, but all i can say is that if you missed the fact that there was an organized effort well, here s president biden has only a certain amount of political capital for keeping his party united. if he needlessly akers progressives on this scotus picks that could create all sorts of problems for him down the line, jeff hauser, revolving door projects. let s see i ve just got so many quotes. it s difficult to imagine someone with a record like judge chiles winning votes from criminal justice advocates like senator cory bjork, even dick durbin. chiles experience is nothing like the diversity of experience that the biden administration has championed. let s see. picking her, chiles, would
0 world at large, and i think it s six months, maybe a year, but that goes on at least on an annual basis, and if these a determination that this person still represents a threat to the united states rp they are continued to be confined. that s the way the system works. are you okay with that? as a policy matter, senator? i m not speaking to my views, that s my understanding is that the periodic review system is an executive branch determination of whether or not they are going to continue to hold people does that make sense to you as a way to deal with these detainees? i m not in a position to speak to the policy or the discretion of the executive branch regarding how they are going to handle detainees. the reason i mention it is because in the brief you argued that the executive brarn doesn t have that option, that if you had had your way, the executive branch could not do periodic reviews about the danger the detainee presents to the united states. they would have to make