analysis provided by the society of conservative lawyers in a paper and i declare my interest as chair of executive written by lawyers both experienced in international law. it is best to go to people with experience in the international law field rather than other field, experience in the international law field rather than otherfield, they conclude as i do that although there are areas which certainly need to be examined with care, the bill falls on the right side of the line. deeming provisions are not unprecedented as has been put out, as has already been set out. i am concerned and i hope the minister will take on and explore the situation raised by the memberfor kenilworth about how deeming provisions deal with international law o obligation because you the deem in domestic law but you can t to oust your international law obligations, that said, i think there is force i refer to the very useful analysis in the society for conservative lawyers pamphlet that in realityf c
you want to put your head in your hands and take ten aspirin. you have to keep notes, you have to go to hr. you have to go to the eeoc sometime. and the percentage of women mostly women who have claims hare heard and jude kated finally in a court, about 5%. compare that to the extraordinary scenes we are seeing now where men are admitting behavior and suffering consequences and ask yourself do we have systemic problems in congress, in the court system that are barring women from coming forward faster when there are claims. a lot of these women s are decades away from the jobs that made them miserable. that s part of it. a woman i was speaking to this morning said your courses of action, possible outcomes if you have been a victim of harassment are all bad. either you are not believed. or you are believed and you are still associated with it. or you do nothing and you live with either the anguish or the guilt or the responsibility of
likely as you said that members of congress will now use their time and resources to investigate the conclusion about wiretapping that the president announced over the weekend on twitter. white house press secretary making clear the president doesn t plan on back pedaling his unsubstantiated claim that former president obama wiretapped his phones during the election. will he with draw the accusation? why would he with draw it until it s ajude kated. still offering no evidence. it s not a question of new proof or less proof or whatever. the answer is the same. despite denials of wiretapping from former top intelligence officials. there was no such wiretap activity. spicer continuing to insist on an investigation. there is a concern about what happened in the 2016 election.
go yet. yes. sean, just wanted to circle on alexis s question. since the dhs guidance did not eliminate daca does that mean the program is remaining in place, it is a civil matter and it s not going away? no, jordan. what it means is that this particular enforcement is tailored to what i ve been referencing over and over again that what we are talking about today is the implementation of those two executive orders. one specifically that is tasking the agencies under dhs to address a very specific problem of the million or so, plus or minus, people that they have identified that have been jude kated having already gone through the process to be adjudicated and taken out of the country. that means the decision on daca could come at any day? that s right. what it means more than anything is that this order does not address that. it s very clear in the q and a. again, i would refer you back to
the major issue for the families in the legal standpoint is the ability to where to file the claim. dun under the montreal convention, the majority of the claims would have to be ajude kated against the carrier in germany, and maybe some in spain p. the three families in america could pursue a claim in the united states court because of the jurisdictions rights they have under the convention, but the measure of the damages and the process is going to be so different. in short a claim in the united states courts based in the american law under the wrongful law of a loved one is quantitatively different than the german courts. i have to get stephen in here and what he said and does it make a difference if it is a criminal act as far as compensation compensation? well, let me address the criminal act. the criminal act probably assists the families.