Not worry about the burden of rahmat and khuzestan, because this event can cause floods some of the provinces for which we have issued an orange warning will happen as you can see on the map, well, the parts that are red , silmons Warning System shows that the water flow in these areas can be high and these rivers may overflow their beds anyway. It may lead to road blockage. It has brought other problems. We ask our dear compatriots that if they have a trip during these days , they should manage the trip. The head of the countrys road police has also advised his compatriots to avoid unnecessary trips according to the warning of the Meteorological Organization and carry full equipment if necessary. From monday to the first of april, many provinces have issued an orange warning. Again, we have a request from our compatriots. The provinces where the warning has been issued are not the right time to travel, and if they want to travel, they must have winter equipment with them. Because ther
Haystack, youre looking for a needle in a stack of needles, and i dont really know how many people frequently dig their hands around a pile of needles, but it seems pretty painful and pretty difficult. And that highlights exactly what the problem is with the Insider Threat. These are people who look exactly like the person next to them. Its not necessarily about trying to figure out whats wrong or whats different. Its about identifying what some of these indicators or red flags along the spectrum are, trying to mitigate the exploitation of them so that a person doesnt reach that Tipping Point and then incorporating, monitoring or detection mechanisms so that you can see some of these behaviors. Its clearly, as i said, a multidimensional problem, so it requires a multidimensional solution. Its a goal of an Insider Threat program to detect, deter and disrupt. You can take a twofold approach in how you combat those objectives. The first is in how you identify the problem. Not only are Ins
The amendment offered by the gentlewoman from california. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, the noes have it. The amendment is not agreed to. Ms. Sanchez mr. Chairman. I request the yeas and nays. The chair the gentlewoman ask has asked for a recorded vote. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule 18, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from california will be postponed. It is now in order to consider amendment number 4 printed in house report 113455. For what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition . Mr. Lamborn mr. Chairman, i have an amendment at the desk. The chair the clerk will designate the amendment. The clerk amendment number 4 printed in house report 113455 offered by mr. Lamborn of colorado. The chair pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from colorado, mr. Lamborn, and a member opposed each will control five minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from colorado. Mr. Lamborn thank you, mr.
The hands of the National Government. And it needed to be exclusively in the hands of the National Government in order to ensure that the United States could be a full sovereign on the world stage. Now, it is true that the subject matter of treaties is different now than it was at the time of the founding, but the framers understood that. They were careful not to impose subject matter limitations on the treaty power because they were wise enough to know they could not foresee what might be important for the United States to be able to negotiate about on a world stage in order to participate fully as a sovereign. And the Chemical Weapons Convention is a deeply apt illustration of exactly why the framers were wise in ensuring that there were not subject matter limitations on the exercise of the treaty power. The Chemical Weapons Convention the United States leadership in the Chemical Weapons Convention has made a big difference in ensuring that this norm, which is in our National Interes