Which is a mathematical calculation of determining the best mix of assets at each level of risk, the optimum returning portfolio. If you assume that private equity volatility was significantly lower than public markets, you would put your money in private equity. From a long term projection standpoint, we put in what is a economic risk. Now the reality if you said what do i think your portfolio will actually do, you dont experience economic volatility in private equity through time because you have valuation processes as we have seen that are lagged and reduce that volatility. We have a separate volatility forecast. This is economic volatility. We have a separate set of volatility numbers to represent accounting volatility so the forecast for your portfolio would look more like what you think in reality. From planning perspective we assign higher volatility. Accounting may undo that as you experience it in your portfolio. These numbers that you see on page 10, 1930 and 45, often time t
Natural resources as the benchmark. This is he more private investments and the risk is about twice as high. It is in line with private equity buyouts. I should have mentioned the higher returns and if we were rationale you dont get higher returns without seeing higher risk. The volatility numbers are higher. There is an improved sharp ratio reflected in the actions put together. A question. One of the things i struggle with with volatility and private equity, it is quite high. Yes. Our experience is substantially lower than that. Exactly, bryan. When we are looking at Asset Allocation longterm particularly for plans that dont have as mat tour portfolio as you do. You run an efficient frontty which is a mathematical calculation of determining the best mix of assets at each level of risk, the optimum returning portfolio. If you assume that private equity volatility was significantly lower than public markets, you would put your money in private equity. From a long term projection standp
Yes. Our experience is substantially lower than that. Exactly, bryan. When we are looking at Asset Allocation longterm particularly for plans that dont have as mat tour portfolio as you do. You run an efficient frontty which is a mathematical calculation of determining the best mix of assets at each level of risk, the optimum returning portfolio. If you assume that private equity volatility was significantly lower than public markets, you would put your money in private equity. From a long term projection standpoint, we put in what is a economic risk. Now the reality if you said what do i think your portfolio will actually do, you dont experience economic volatility in private equity through time because you have valuation processes as we have seen that are lagged and reduce that volatility. We have a separate volatility forecast. This is economic volatility. We have a separate set of volatility numbers to represent accounting volatility so the forecast for your portfolio would look mo
With with volatility and private equity, it is quite high. Yes. Our experience is substantially lower than that. Exactly, bryan. When we are looking at Asset Allocation longterm particularly for plans that dont have as mat tour portfolio as you do. You run an efficient frontty which is a mathematical calculation of determining the best mix of assets at each level of risk, the optimum returning portfolio. If you assume that private equity volatility was significantly lower than public markets, you would put your money in private equity. From a long term projection standpoint, we put in what is a economic risk. Now the reality if you said what do i think your portfolio will actually do, you dont experience economic volatility in private equity through time because you have valuation processes as we have seen that are lagged and reduce that volatility. We have a separate volatility forecast. This is economic volatility. We have a separate set of volatility numbers to represent accounting
The last year. If not the last week. We see the vix picking up as well. Unsurprisingly. Another times during the week, there isnt much fundamental news coming throughout the day, it is more the gyrations and ripple effects that are continuing during the selloff as investors and traders try to position themselves. Technical levels are becoming more important as well. Take a look at the bloomberg. Here is the s p 500 with its moving averages. I want to zoom in on it to give you a look at what is happening in todays session. What you had here, here is that 100 day moving average. Right now, we are right smack addict. 26. 39 is that level. Give it a day, we fell below it and bounced back up. There was a note from Michael Close that said if we do more definitively below it, then we could see more momentum down toward the 200 day moving average, which is at 2538. This is something that traders are continuing to watch. Lets take a look at some of the movers in todays session. Amidst all this