summit to see how we can handle it. so this program could not be better timed. because as you pointed out we re going to discuss what we know about the biology or aggression so we pite actually be helpful to society in this way. rose: the charlie rose brain series three is underwritten by the alfred p shown foundation episode one coming up now. funding for charlie rose is provided by the following: rose: funding for charlie rose has been provided by: rose: additional funding provided by: and by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and information services worldwide. captioning sponsored by rose communications from our studios in new york city, this is charlie rose. tonight we continue our ongoing exploration of the remarkable human brant with our third brain series. our focus will be on brain science and society. each program will cover a critical social issue with an examination of its neurobiological basis its developmental process and its broader social log
not for being the direct perpetrator of the murder of the but not stopping or reporting what was happening. contreras, a legal advisor, has failed to take him to court. he says the country s laws of impunity make it hard and cases like this particularly difficult. if you take into account that in chile there are two , one oftial candidates them the daughter of the victim, there is a whole political dynamic that explains why the judges refuse to enforce the law and indict him. this is not fair. it is arbitrary. but in chile, we are used to this. santiago is littered with grim reminders of the past. this person is the director of another former torture center, where in the garden every rose represents a woman killed. the torturesurvived which involved beatings, electric shock, and more. there was a particular torture they used against women, like me, who refused to talk. it involved violent sexual abuse. i was pregnant at the time and i loved my baby. he said the country di
the reasons they do such terrible things. you ll be shown a series of scenarios. you should immediately respond to the question by pressing the yes or no button. you take normal people. and if you give them a moral dilemma like would you kill one person to save five lives, that s a difficult decision for many of us. but when we do the same thing with psychopaths, their amygdala is functioning much less, then how moral is it of us to punish psychopaths as harshly as we, do assuming that they never asked to be born with an amygdala that was broken? two people often can have a lesion or some brain ab normality in exactly the same place, and it manifests self in completely different ways. raine agrees that two people can have the same defect and one might resort to violent crime, the other to violent sports. but he says there are now more reliable bio markers that should not be ignored. but you look at the murderer here, and you can see a distinct lack of activity in th
decision-making, in empathy, in conscience, feeling remorse, feeling guilt, which is one of the reasons they do such terrible things. you ll be shown a series of scenarios. you should immediately respond to the question by pressing the yes or no button. you take normal people. and if you give them a moral dilemma like would you kill one person to save five lives, that s a difficult decision for many of us. but when we do the same thing with psychopaths, their amygdala is functioning much less, then how moral is it of us to punish psychopaths as harshly as we, do assuming that they never asked to be born with an amygdala that was broken? two people often can have a lesion or some brain ab normality in exactly the same place, and it manifests itself in completely different ways. raine agrees that two people can have the same defect and one might resort to violent crime, the other to violent sports. but he says there are now more reliable bio markers that should not be i