many years, i think it is incumbent upon the department of justice to either do something now, file whatever charges they think they can bring, or they need to just announce they are not going to do anything because five years is plenty of time to put together a charge along these lines. harris: so when chairman comer says wait until wednesday, that s just a couple of days from now. you don t think that what he could bring forth would have any effect on what the d.o.j. is already looking at with regard to hunter biden? don t get me wrong. if they come out with additional evidence of additional criminal activity. that s something the department of justice can act upon there is nothing to say they can t add charges or open up a new file, an investigative file on hunter biden. i am talking about what they are already investigating. this is going back to 2018. obvious they have enough to convict him even on the application for the gun. he said that he was not actively using controlled
report. if that s the government is investigating him for the question is whether he followed this law. whether he registered and it s a criminal violation. there could be other things too. when they made the arrests at dallas airport of his two associates they just charged them with one charge on four different violations. it looked lilk there was probably a lot of ongoing investigation they had to quickly amend to file the charges. and there s probably a lot going on behind the scenes. they can of course still add charges to that. it s not over once the indictment is issued. president trump is saying he doesn t ech know if rudy giuliani is his lawyer. is he too tainted at this point for the president to even acknowledge him? no question he is. when the president s lawyer is lawyering up, you can t be the president s lawyer anymore. not only lawyering up but on the issue and the in the very country that s involved in the
this law, whether he registered, and it s a criminal violation. there could be you know, there could be other things too. when they made those arrests the other night of his two associates, they just charged him with one charge on four different violations. it looked to to me like there was a lot of ongoing investigation that they had to quickly amend so they could file those charges, and there s probably a lot going on behind the scenes. and they can of course still add charges to the guys. it s not once the indictment is issued. exactly. mark, president trump is saying he doesn t even know if rudy giuliani is still his lawyer. is he too tainted at this point for the president to even acknowledge him any longer? no question that he is. when the president s lawyer is lawyering up, you can t be the president s lawyer anymore. and not only lawyering up but lawyering up on the issue, the very issue and the very country that s involved in the central investigation of the impeachm
out that this man has been an employee since 1998, he undergoes recurring criminal background checks, has nothing derogatory that s come up in the past, he s not on any watch list, not on the no-fly list. so although prosecutors have presented these links to isis, they don t, at least right now, have evidence that this mechanic was motivated by isis. otherwise, wolf, the charges would reflect that. but we should also add, they can always add charges, as well. renee, thanks for that report. very comprehensive. now to the white house, as president trump considers retaliation against iran for the attack on saudi oil facilities. let s go to our chief white house correspondent, jim acosta. jim, we heard some rather provocative language today from the president and from his secretary of state. reporter: that s right, wolf. president trump and secretary of state mike pompeo, they are ramping up their rhetoric on iran. the president told reporters earlier today he s considering what he c
have chosen to add charges for loughlin and her husband. let s talk about the debate. we had a big night watching these ten candidates on the stage for the first time together instead of two stages and having them separated. let s look at one of the most combative exchanges from the debate last night. you said they would have to buy? if she qualifies for medicaid, it s automatic. are you forgetting already what you said just two minutes ago? i mean i can t believe that you said two minutes ago that they had to buy in, and now you re say they don t have to buy in. you re forgetting that. forgetting, over and over he said that. i mean it s like you know what julian castro is saying. and i wonder what you thought about this moment and also, i mean, it struck me as sort of not what we have come to expect in general from julian castro. right. and if you listened to the reaction from the crowd, it was very clear that most of the people in the audience took it