that is something that is difficult to do even though that is what this white house keeps acerting is h asserting is happening. it was after they found out that he lied to the vice president that he had to go. that is really difficult. that doesn t seem to make a lot of sense. we have seen from some reporting that michael flynn was in contact in the desire being expressed by incoming trump administration to change the focus and try to allay fears of some russian officials when the obama administration was implementing sanctions on russia in response to the election. we knew that they knew that that was going on. does that mean collusion? no. it goes against the idea that michael flynn was sort of a lone wolf acting on his own and not in contact or acting in a concerted effort at least on policy with other members of the transition at that time.
the nation the night of the attack and he s saying it again now. he s throwing it down and not saying it wasn t just me being sad that i saw these upset pictures. this is actually in our strategic national interest to have done this. and that is, you know, he is stepping up, doing the opposite of second-guessing himself. he s acerting that there was a real role to play for the united states here on behalf of the united states citizens, not just to react to the chemical attack. the letter was like strangely normal. that was the thing. and the thing about this entire syria attack or bombing, it is not that controversial really. we re talking about something that obama was trying to do. trump did it. but controversial in the tactic that he took, right? very controversial in the tactic. according to washington, that is. and controversial in the problems that it could create in the region. obama tried to build a coalition and get congress behind him to do this exact thing. now trump d