i have to prove absence malice . so it s a pretty high bar but it shouldn t be the case with royce. so you take this case you bring w up before a jury. y i would assume you havepr your odds are pretty good of winning. well, we think so. and you re absolutely correct. thereth is a doctrine under the defamation of public figuree but even in that case so we vewe lost the lawsuit that baldwin aw you know, he s got a he s a serial offender. he s done this over and over again over the course of years and he knows very well what sng going to happen when he said something to two point four million people which by the way, is five times the population of the state where royce lives i. and so the reach is incrediblean and thed harm was was an idiot.l race will tell you that she immediately started getting hateful messages, death threats and that s the samel for her sister and for lieutenant mccollum s widow. what did you make choice of
have to prove the absence malice so it is a pretty high bar but it should not be the case with roice. so you take this case and bring it before a jury. i would assume your odds are pretty good of winning. well, we think so. you are absolutely correct, there is a doctrine with a public figure, even in that case, we allege in the lawsuit that baldwin is a serial offender come has done this over and over again over the course of years, and he knows very well what is going to happen when he sensed something to 2.4 million people, which by the way is five times the population of the state where roice lives. the reach is incredible and the harm was immediate. roice will tell you she immediately started getting hateful messages, death threats, the same for her sister and lance corporal mccollum s widow. sean: what did you make of