A news show featuring the top headlines of the day from pop culture to politics, which are discussed by a rotating panel of four women and one man. A stickler for a speedy trial that he often snaps at the mueller team if he thinks they are dragging things out. The mueller team complained about the judge with emotion, protesting a comment that he made yesterday, where he urged the special counsels lawyers not to focus so much on loans that Paul Manafort was denied, he wanted them to focus on loans that he got. The mueller team didnt think it was fair, they wrote in the motion, the courts suggestion that the government was unnecessarily spending time on a loan that manafort did not receive undermines the wellestablished law on conspiracy, undercuts the charge in count 28, and is likely to confuse and mislead the jury. The mueller team wants the judge to do the same thing yesterday, explain that he may have made a mistake to the jury. But they wanted to it happen this morning. And it didn
inspector general for the doj. not intelligence community. so, if the intelligence community mislead. brian: right. some people into the fbi into spying, i don t think horowitz knows that. brian: exactly. but barr. we that s why i think this friction is developing right now. brian: right. even though he respects the report and said some positive statements he might include a paper with it to give his point of view on it along with it. new york times today say this about steele and his report. is he known as honest, sometimes pursue targets that others believe is a waste of time according to two people familiar with the assessment. they will have a lot on steele in his background. other big story is ukraine and yesterday former vice president biden sat down with axios, with mike allen. and mike allen went directly at him burisma and his son s role. as usual, he gets angry. listen. i don t know what he was doing. i know he was on the board.
memo warning about steele s credibility. we know three separate instances before the fisa was signed, the bulk of information we now know is the unverified dirty russian dossier, likely russian disinformation according to the new york times from the get-go, but they were warned about steele s credibility before they signed the first fisa. they were warned by bruce sword. the uk was warning about his credibility. that steele had an agenda, it wasn t verified. and hillary paid for it. they used it anyway. now we know it s unverifiable, because steele never stood by his own dossier and under oath said i have no idea if any of it is true. to me, that seems like premeditated fraud on fisa court. when you couple that with andrew mccabe, the deputy fbi director saying no fisa warrant, that makes me think they didn t care about what they were presenting to the court. and that was a fraud and they knew it was a fraud, but they said it was verified and it wasn t.
memo warning about steele s credibility. we know three separate instances before the fisa was signed, the bulk of information we now know is the unverified dirty russian dossier, likely russian disinformation according to the new york times from the get-go, but they were warned about steele s credibility before they signed the first fisa. they were warned by bruce sword. the uk was warning about his credibility. that steele had an agenda, it wasn t verified. and hillary paid for it. they used it anyway. now we know it s unverifiable, because steele never stood by his own dossier and under oath said i have no idea if any of it is true. to me, that seems like premeditated fraud on fisa court. when you couple that with andrew mccabe, the deputy fbi director saying no fisa warrant, that makes me think they didn t care about what they were presenting to the court. and that was a fraud and they knew it was a fraud, but they said it was verified and it wasn t.
official kathleen kavalec warned the fbi and doj about the dossier s bogus claims, they used it anyway. what you say? mr. mueller, the doj official, bruce ohr, he raised august in 2016 question about steele s credibility. hillary paid for the dossier and that it was never about verified but they used it anyway in the fisa warrants. did the fbi have an obligation to immediately, when they find out, that it s not true that they put it in those applications, do they need to go back to the fisa court with thatin information? yes or no? if russia collusion was your mandate, how is it possible you didn t investigate campaign opp research bought and paid for by hillary clinton, filled with russian lies? how is thatn, possible, esmr. mueller? why not at least refer it to another office for further investigation like you did with cohen and taxi medallions? at any point did you think to investigate if there was a premeditated fraud committed on the fisa court to spy on the trump campaign? mr. mu