crimes, comes as he prepares for a meeting with xi jinping in moscow next week. hello, well come everyone. sandra smith in new york. john, we have made it to friday. john: we have, feels like monday for some reason with all the news happening. john roberts in happening. the icc claims putin is responsible for overseeing the unlawful abduction and deportation of children from ukraine to russia. moscow is calling the move meaningless. sandra: chief national security correspondent jennifer griffin is live at the pentagon l. what impact will this have in the short-term on vladimir putin? well, sandra, the announcement from the hague international criminal court could have an impact on whether xi of china goes ahead with a meeting with putin. if he does, he will be meeting with an alleged war criminal, now has an arrest warrant issued for the mass abduction of ukrainian children taken to russia and placed infiltration camps. modern day equivalent of the camps during world
prosecution. do you agree with me that this is a legitimate appellant issue for trump? he can put it in the way that i put it. i don t know for what i was convicted there are two appellate issues here. the first one is what you said look, a basic fundamental principle of our criminal law process, of our constitution is a defendant is entitled to notice in advance of trial with specificity what he s being charged as for what he s being tried for that s why we have indictments. now the indictment in this case does not specify what the underlying quote-unquote unlawful means are. and in fact, i found this to be shocking. frankly, the judge did not make the prosecutors commit to any of those unlawful means until we were just it s about into closing arguments. so that s gonna be appeal issue number one. i was never put on specific notice of what i was being tried for appeal argument number two is going to be this one of the bases for conviction here. one of the unlawful means is a violati
histories from my raisins and this is really a concerted, which or a sibling. everything you heard, this is a witch hunt by numerous judges democratic judges. you take a look at it and goren is a huaxia. when he did was a disgrace is being reviewed by the appellant and i hope they do justice is everybody s looking and nobody no business is coming into the city. none whatsoever they re looking at that case cases and threat to democracy, frankly, what took place bag a cricket ag, letitia james paid and the facts we can or the fact that i m going to get drunk bomb, going to get trump. that s all she said for two years and its people don t want to see this stuff we have violent criminal zola with the streets of new york and nothing happens. so even when they catch him, they let him know bao nobel whatsoever so this is just a
it s going to be exhausting for everybody involved, and they re going to have to operate on multiple fronts, the appellant front, the trial front, what s happening outside of the courtroom, so i think it can happen, and i hope very much it happens without any incident. sue craig, we have taken so much of your time, an hour and a half to be exact. thank you so much for being here. i hope you ll come back tomorrow. of course. all of the news. everyone else sticks around. much more in our breaking news coverage, the full 12-person jury in donald trump s hush money election interference trial has been seated. our correspondent lisa rubin is on the way making her way to the cameras. she ll join us in just a minute. deadline white house continues after a quick break. don t go anywhere. ontinues after a quick break. don t go anywhere. the night. it s all the things that keep this world turning. it s the go-tos that keep us going. the places we cheer. trust. hang out. and check in. the
that nobody else making mistakes? in that branch, no one else was having those that branch, no one else was having those mistakes. you that branch, no one else was having those mistakes. that branch, no one else was having those mistakes. you have no concern about the form those mistakes. you have no concern about the form of those mistakes. you have no concern about the form of words those mistakes. you have no concern about the form of words being - those mistakes. you have no concern about the form of words being used? j about the form of words being used? no because pension and allowances were checked and it was found on her submissions were checked and it was found on her submissions showed issues with vouchers? submissions showed issues with vouchers? ., ., ., submissions showed issues with vouchers? ., ., , submissions showed issues with vouchers? ., ., ., . vouchers? you have no concerns about mr gardnerjust vouchers? you have no concerns about mr gardnerjust his