Page 26 - 537 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from 537. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Much backlash from people in your party and admittedly he s to the right of you and he doesn t understand why someone who has such a good story from growing up in low-income housing and becomes a legitimate billionaire and now he s talking about throwing his hat into the arena, why he is getting so much blowback. because the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. we ve watched this movie before. in 2000 when ralph nader won, he got 92,000 votes in the state of florida and that election came down to 537 votes in my state because ralph nader, and a variety of other reasons, too, if ralph nader hadn t run al gore would have been president. so as much respect as some of us might have for howard schultz and his accomplishments and he s been a good democrat for many years, for him to suggest that the democratic party is far too left for him and he needs to, ....
Spoiler effect 2000 ends up being the perfect example. ralph nader got 93,000 votes in florida. al gore only lost florida by 537 votes. also, by the way, pat buchanan. there was the whole issue with the butterfly ballot, folks who seem to in confusion have voted for him. in that very narrow circumstance, you can clearly see where third party had the effect. but when it comes to the question here of schultz and what effect he would have, you heard it there. the democrats, they say he splits the anti-trump vote. trump has a majority disapproval rating right now. the democrats saying those folks will be content to vote against trump, don t give them more than one option. give the folks one option, they ll all vote against trump and trump will be out of office. it s a theory that schultz would complicate that. put that anywhery out there. these things don t always the history of these third-party candidacies is they don t always land the way conventional wisdom says they will. here s the ....
Clinton. 2000 ended up being a perfect example of it. ralph nader got 93,000 votes in florida. al gore only lost florida by 537 votes. also, by the way, pat buchanan. there was the whole issue with the butterfly vote that seemed in confusion to vote for him. in that very narrow circumstance, you can clearly see where third party had the effect. but when it comes to the question here of schultz and what effect he would have, you heard it there. the democrats say he splits the anti-trump vote. trump has a majority disapproval rating right now. the democrats saying those folks will be content to vote against trump, don t give them more than one option. give the folks one option, they ll all vote against trump and trump will be out of office. it s a theory that schultz would complicate that. the history of these third-party candidaies is they don t always land the way they say they will. and does his candidacy just ....
as the washington post points out, quote, almost immediately, reactions began pouring in at a furious clip, noting some on the left fumed that a schultz run would split the anti-trump vote, essentially handing the incombt the election. it reenited a perennial debate, how much do third parties actually influence elections. it s a complicated question because there s no way to definitively know how a third party voter would have voted if they could only choose between a democrat and republican. however, in a key 2016 swing states of michigan, wivlg whisk, and pennsylvania, green party candidate jill stein won a larger number of votes than clinton lost to trump by. so if all those stein votes or even some of them had gone to clinton, she would have won the presidential election. and catch this. in the year 2000, al gore lost florida to george w. bush by 537 votes, by some counts, but green party candidate ralph nader got more than 90,000 votes in ....
Green party candidate. they were just a symptom, each of them was, to the party of clinton. 2000 ended up being a perfect example of it. ralph nader got 93,000 votes in florida. al gore only lost florida by 537 votes. also, by the way, pat buchanan. there was the whole issue with the butterfly vote that seemed in confusion to vote for him. in that very narrow circumstance, you can clearly see where third party had the effect. but when it comes to the question here of schultz and what effect he would have, you heard it there. the democrats say he splits the an anti-trump vote. trump has a majority disapproval rating right now. the democrats saying those folks will be content to vote against trump, don t give them more than one option. give the folks one option, they ll all vote against trump and trump will be out of office. it s a theory that schultz would complicate that. ....