we ve talked $3.7 trillion, $1.7 trillion. you know, the massive social spending bill, we haven t actually been talking about what s in it. i think senator manchin like a lot of the democrats are saying, look, we have to be fiscally responsible. don t give yourself a few trillion dollars in considering montana or indiana or anywhere else. republicans weren t worried about their things, but we have a real opportunity combined with the infrastructure bill to be able to address those needs that people have. i do think we ll get there. look, i m frustrated that forget about me, most people out there say, look, these are these democrats fighting democrats as opposed to that actually gets to something more broadly,
years old. new lots would mean barges would move much faster through the system. similarly investments in ford infrastructure will ease up those points. better roads and faster railways would all make a difference. this is a once in a generation opportunity for democrats to show the people that public investment can work. that means this money should be spent well and fast. congregation that advocates for good, cost effective government put out and excellent report in 2014 about infrastructure approval that should be read by everyone administering funds at the state and local level. six-year delays starting construction projects, it notes, could cost america $3.7 trillion. that s more than double the amount of money needed to modernize key sectors of the country s infrastructure by the end of the decade. columnist philip howard writes in the report, as practiced
and dams that made america s waterways work should have been replaced by now. many of them being 60 or 70 years old. new lochs would mean barges would move much faster through the system. similarly investments in port infrastructure will ease up those points. better roads and faster railways would all make a difference. this is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for democrats to show the people that public investment can work. that means this money should be spent well and fast. congregation that advocates for good, cost effective government put out and excellent report in 2014 about infrastructure approval that should be read by everyone administering funds at the state and local level. six-year delays starting construction projects, it notes, could cost america $3.7 trillion. that s more than double the
they had 19 this mopster 3.5, $3.7 trillion vehicle they will use to get this monster through that they will pair it down, satisfy their conscious that way manchin and sinema and still have this huge thing. they have priscilla the house, progressives, and the senate they have got sinema and sinema and manchin those are serious obstacles to navigate. bret: you know, harold, we talk about this in the way of the senate and looking at those moderates, kirsten sinema and joe manchin, there are others, warner from virginia, kaine from virginia there are others who have problems with big deficit debt numbers. but why isn t it phrased the other way? why isn t the pressure on house speaker pelosi to put this bill now passed the senate on the
having problems finding businesses that can actually employ people. one missing part of this story that i want people to understand, go back 10 years under the obama white house. the federal budget was about $3.7 trillion. it now is proposed by joe biden to be $6 trillion. 50% increase in our federal budget in over 10 years. the debt has swelled from roughly 16 trillion to nearly 30 trillion. nearly doubling. there is a huge massive effect. is your government that much more effective and efficient with a 50% increase? no. it s more bureaucrats. more government. more regulators. and the consequence our economy is suffering and we are not growing like we should be. will: jason, i want to see what you think about a story that caught my attention. there is a lot of speculation about president trump and his intentions in 2024. on wayne allyn ruth s radio program, 2022 was brought up. what they talked about was