Page 3 - 1793 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from 1793. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In 1793 Today - Breaking & Trending Today
It will involve the retention of national defense information. just because something is caused by government sensitive, it does not mean it fits into the sub category of stuff we called national defense information. that is specific to the defense of the united states. and the person has to understand that this is something that could actually damage the united states or ate an adversary for government. there s a lesser provision in there that makes it the same crime you can be convicted of 1793, for simply gathering defence information with understanding that it s injuries to the united states or helpful to an adversary. and the kind of fits the pattern here. he knew, he was told, there was a subpoena, they want to get back. he didn t do it. that sounds like 1793 to me. so if he did violate this act what are the consequences? frank? ten years in prison. you would have to also, if you ever gotten a compensations from, say, a foreign power or some third-party for discussing ....
Aiden adversary or foreign government. there s a lesser provision in there that makes it the same crime you can be convicted of 1793, for simply for retaining, gathering, collecting national defence information with the understanding that it s injurious to the united states or helpful to an adversary. and a kind of fits the pattern here. he knew, he was told, there was a subpoena, they want to get back. he didn t do it. that sounds like 1793 to me. so if he did violate this act what are the consequences? frank? ten years in prison. you would have to also, if you never got any compensations, from say, a foreign power or some third-party for discussing that kind of information, you would have to forfeit all that money back if you indeed got it. but look as a counter intelligence professional what really up concerns me stephanie is the damage assessment. so, everyone is focused on crime crime, crime. i am focused on damage. this has been sitting there for, what, a year and a half ma ....
It was. it was really startling to see that with regard to a former president of the united states. you explained it well up top, stephanie. this is not 1794, which actually involves the transmission to an adversary, or foreign power, of national defense information. but it s very close. it s 73, one of the most serious crimes can charge someone with. it will involve the retention of national defense information. just because something is classified or government sensitive, does not mean it fits into the sub category of stuff we call national defense information. that is specific to the defense of the united states. and the person has to understand that this is something that could actually damage the united states or aide an adversary or foreign government. there s a lesser provision in there that makes it the same crime can be convicted of 1793 for simply gathering, collecting national defense information with understanding that it s injuries to the ....
United states or helpful to an adversary. and the kind of fits the pattern here. he knew, he was told, there was a subpoena, they wanted it back. he didn t do it. that sounds like 1793 to me. so if he did violate this act what are the consequences? frank? ten years in prison. you would have to also, if you ever gotten a compensations from, say, a foreign power or some third-party, for discussing that kind of information, you would have to forfeit all that money back if you indeed got it. but look as a counter intelligence professional, what really concerns me, stephanie, is the damage assessment. so everyone is focused on, crime, crime, crime. i m focused on damage. this has been sitting there for what? a year and a half maybe. we are just now through neither sources or discussions with trump s attorney with doj just realized, the gravity of what is still there. and it has been there and exposed to who? who ....
Mark: welcome back. who said this? there is a rank due to the u.s. among nations when will be with held if not absolutely lost by the representation of weakness, if we desire to avoid insult we must be able to repel it, and it must be known that we re at all-times ready for war. what was a neocon, a war monger? an interventionist? who would say such things? that was george washington, december 33, 1793. his state of the union. i m very practical and realistic with matter the of war and peace, not union ideologue, but i know an enemy and evil when see it, if we re not prepared for it the cost economic, military, ....