Live Breaking News & Updates on 14th Supreme Court
Stay updated with breaking news from 14th supreme court. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Conservatives will try to do is make sure they make the case and gorsuch is the worthy heir to the scalia seat. they think he is an appropriate person, the best person to continue to conservative legacy on the court of the late justice scalia. gorsuch met with 72 senators from the left and right in private. this is going to be the first chance that senators who like him and senators who may be skeptical of him are going to have to ask questions on camera in front of everybody. the whole world s watching. we think it will get underway in minutes. shannon: he s shaking the hands of republicans and democrats alike and moving to the table where he ll officially begin his answers and grilling period. there s been comical moments as you see the number of cameras in ....
I don t see why it has to be a choice. my law clerks tell me in the few cases i have dissented it s equal to a republican to a democrat colleague again because we don t have democrat or republican judges. according to the wall street journal of the eight cases i ve identified i ve been reviewed our court was affirmed in seven of them. now, i think louise might argue for the eighth because the supreme court doesn t like a procedural precedent we were bound to follow so they remanded it back. we decided on the merits as the court instructed and defied. eight of eight. on the separation of powers, it ....
I don t know why it has to be a choice. my law clerks tell me in the few cases where i have decented, i am likely to descend from a democratic appointed colleague as a republican appointed colleague. that s, again, because we don t have democrat or republican judges. according to the wall street journal, i m told that of the eight cases they have identified that i have sat on that have been reviewed by the united states supreme court our court was affirmed in seven of them. now, i think louise might argue for the eighth. because in that case, the supreme court didn t like a procedural precedent that as a panel we were bound to follow. they remanded it back. we decided on the merits as the court instructed, denied. eight out of eight. on separation of powers, it is, ....
Power changed, founders worry that is the definition of tyranny. you can see why. judges would make rotton legislatures. we are life tenured. you can t get rid of us. it only takes a couple of us to make a decision or nine or 12, depending on the court. it would be a pretty poor way to run a democracy. at the same time, with respect, legislatures might not make great judges because they are answerable to the people. when you come to court with a case or a controversy about a past fact, you want a neutral, rigidly neutral, fair, scrupulously fair decision maker. you want somebody who is going to put politics aside. so the separation of powers, i ....
Supreme court justice if fortunate enough to be concerned. the same process and rules apply. ok. this is the 14th supreme court hearing i participated in. i have a pretty good idea of some of the questions you re going to get today. you re going to be asked to make promises and commitments about how you ll rule on particular issues. now, they won t necessarily ask you that directly, for instance how will you rule on this issue or that issue instead ask you on old cases whether they were correctly decided. that s another way of asking the very same question. they know you can t answer but they re going to ask you anyway. i ve heard justices nominated by ....