Page 14 - 1182 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from 1182. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In 1182 Today - Breaking & Trending Today
This is not how the system is supposed to work. the president under the 8 u.s. code 1182 clearly has the authority. barack obama use dhd authority. george w. bush used this authority it goes all the way back to world war ii. it is clearly the purview of the president of the united states to temporarily suspend individuals from coming in if he believes they are going to do our country harm until we can do better vetting. there is no question about it. clayton: you saw paul ryan having to drink that flat guinness earlier. the outrage. clayton: what would have you done handed a flat guinness would have you said hand me one with a little bit of foam. i will drink this one but next time hand me one with a foam. sandra: called a head. there is a little bit there. pete: it sat there. not enough. clayton: thanks, corey have great weekend. thank you, guys. clayton: clay mexicans getting caught on border. not ours. ....
We have never seen since reagan when there was a cuba ban with one country what about carter? with no national security basis. what about every president? no, the fact is danny wants to address a specific provision that gives the president immigration authority. that provision is tied to a specific national security threat. let s address the national security threat here. what is it, chris? what is it, danny? what s the national security interest? in a court of law about this? you don t need to question the basis because we have it everywhere from the actions on the campaign trail to other indications. the authority danny cevallos has given to the president on the basis of his discretion on issues of national security interest when it comes to immigration, where is it? 1182. whenever the president in his opinion finds that entry of any class of aliens is detrimental where s the detrimental ....
The relevant statute in its opinion which could have shown the president has the authority. you heard it before, but since the court didn t, let me quote it again. 8 u.s. code 1182 states whenever the president finds the entry of any aliens or any class of aliens in the united states would be detrimental to the united states, he may be proclamation and for such period that he deem necessary suspend all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem appropriate. the department of justice said in a statement that they strongly disagree with the federal district court s ruling which is flawed in reasoning and scope. the president s executive order falls within his lawful authority in seeking to protect our nation s security. the department will defend his ....
I think the courts will knock it down again. melissa: the argument they used last time in a lot of ways was about the rhetoric on the campaign trail. they re saying that again. will it work again? it s completely irrelevant. look, this is a ban for national security, folks. somebody s grandma can t come and visit for 90 days? that s really too bad. this is far larger than that. existing visa holders can still get in. he changed the refugees so there s not a life time ban on refugees. he fixed the problem. i don t know about that. we ll have to see. melissa: that was the same time last time though, right? there was the same thought about whrorpb the campaign rhetoric made sense or should be brought in. they did bring it in anyway. i know. but the courts should get rid of it. it doesn t matter. 1182usc is what matters. we followed that law. melissa: last words chris? like i said, fit looks like a duck, quacks like a duck. trump has no credibility when it comes to a ban. ....
Certainly not politically correct, perhaps offensive, it is not what is in this order. the words obviously matter to this particular judge, who was an obama appointee. also, what is interesting, the ninth u.s. circuit court of appeals, while they didn t reinstate the travel ban, they never ruled on discrimination claims. it brings in an interesting legal point. that is one of the areas that this particular judge is also trying to focus on. i think that it goes back to the merits of it, the fact of the constitution grants broad authority in terms of immigration to the president. the president, under this u.s. code 1182, can decide who enters and does not enter the united states. when you think about this merits of the case, the fact that the constitution was to be supporting the present on this in terms of granting this broad authority, it does have a stronger ground in terms of its legal merits. obviously, the judge ruled differently. ....