Latest Breaking News On - மிக்னிச்சோழச் - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Agriculture your username 3 hours ago Following an agreement between the two parties, Karen Dhanowa and Nilima Amin, plaintiffs in a California Northern District lawsuit against Subway who previously claimed that the restaurant’s tuna is fake filed an amended complaint on Monday altering their allegations to claims that the tuna is not “100% tuna” from sustainable fisheries as Subway claimed. In the initial complaint filed on January 21 against Subway Restaurants Inc., Franchise World Headquarters LLC, and Subway Franchise Advertising Trust Fund LTD, the plaintiffs claimed that Subway’s products represented as tuna are falsely advertised and labeled. The complaint said “in reality, the Products do not contain tuna nor have any ingredient that constitutes Tuna.” It alleged that Subway’s tuna is falsely advertised because consumers will pay more if they believe it is tuna.

United statesKaren dhanowaNilima aminDogra law groupSubway restaurants incLanier law firmBaker mckenzieSubway franchise advertising trust fundFranchise world headquartersCalifornia northern districtஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்நீலிம அமின்டோக்ரா சட்டம் குழுசுரங்கப்பாதை உணவகங்கள் இன்க்லானியர் சட்டம் நிறுவனம்ரொட்டி சுடுபவர் மகெந்ஸீ