Parking. Ill defer to mr. T. Thank you corey teague assistant Zoning Administrator so i building this the crux is between accessory parking and nonaccessory or principle parking the planning code for ever use depend on where it is at allows a maximum amount of seriousy parking that is reserved and dedicated if you have a one unit Apartment Building with 50 parks those Parking Spaces are dedicated those to building not for anything he will the code says if you provide parking as an accessory the access is its own principle like residential or commercial in and of itself. Like a parking garage. It is essential a parking garage that has a stand alone parking garage or within a development we treat that parking indefinite not an accessoryy not allowed to be reserved it is all the tdm measures they have are aiming to address people who live and work or visit a specific land use; right . An apartment or on Office Building whereas the principle parking the parking garages space are short time not dedicated that concludes my remarks use this is difficult not a lot of tdm measures that can encourage someone to take a bus or walk to the parking garage the desire parking garage is to drive and park our cars much more of a land use tdm dont deal with parking garages a whole different type of parking the point in the staff report that by and large parking garages whether stand alone or part of a project they require a separate approval that is something for a land use perspective if you approve that parking garage it will generate trips thats the purpose of it and much more it is better to focus on it from a land use they are different and we found a way to somewhat account for the spaces if youre adding a parking garage within a prolong itself slopes to a slanted alone. One last question is about enforcement im a developer and commit to a complaint basis system how is this the same or different. Commissioner Vice President richards. Yeah. This is one of the things were really excited about part of the program the Property Owner that is dedicated will be responsible for the annual compliance reports to the Department Staff that demonstrates they are implementing the measures that were part of their tdm and coinciding once every 3 years staff does an audit to make sure the measures are in fact, in place an incentive for the Property Owner to comply other than being great people that if they have an compliant tdm monitoring years in a row that annual compliance moves to once every 3 years. Great go ahead director. One quick last question because we had nonprofits got up and said we should be exempt were getting money youre taking away money one project covered by this the boys and girls and should we allow a mechanism for the ones every ones in a while to and we definitely have supportive the difficulty we have when any requirement in the planning code is that the code regulars the land use and didnt distinguish between the tenancies or for profit or nonprofit that is difficult to do that it can change over time from an impact perspective the same land use impact the difficulty there is that if you provide an exemption that exemption is Siemens Corporation there in perpetuity it becomes a difficult situation i understand so im holy supportive and think that as good piece of the puzzle and cant say wait to see the montana reports come once this is upcoming. Director rahaim. First thanks to staff this great thanks to sarah for pushing this forward as one of her last major pieces i want to remind us ironicly speakers are asking for changes i get it there is a tendency to think it can solve all the transportation problems that is a piece of a bigger puzzle it is only dealing with no projects that come in it as different and much more effective way of dealing with projects that come forward it is a big deal but thats all it is doesnt deal with the problems of Transportation System secondly, he hope the Commission Releases that adding a lot of the requirements that are proposed today such as whether we have parking minimums in other parts of city or look at parking garages separately those are excellent proposals but i would urge us not to complicate this proposal at this time i do think those are separate land use and require citywide discussion if you make those kinds of changes that is important we look at those issues separately particularly in light of their separately separate land issues i just want to say that thats it. laughter . Just to repeat my thanks but urge us to move forward oh, oh im sorry on the enforcement issue the remind you approved a budget with two positions just for this and that was approved with the mayors budget signing last week one new position and a staff position next year well have fulltime staff devoted to this. Commissioner antonini. Move to adopt a recommendation. With the errata from staff. Second. Commissioner johnson. Thank you okay so parking im dropping it ill only say we had this discussion around the Warriors Arena and people thinking we have this accessory parking for the arena and shuttle for the people to eliminates the traffic and a tdm for seriousy parking would be easier to have now im dropping it. Commissioner moore. Would the commission be prepared to add forward with footnotes those issues that were brought forward by the public of concern to us and stay as ongoing subjects to be discussed or being acknowledged in the future i was any Public Comment on what director rahaim said were not here to suggest amendments i share the opening questions theyve expressed as quantitative comments to keep the dialogue open and ask us to repeat that. I think that is not part of any motion but understood those will be brought up again, im sure. What would the rest of the Commission Support that. I would. Well, i guess it is not a condition it could be not a condition. Just a comment. Yeah. Objective a lot of things were brought up but director rahaim said we dont want to complicate this by bring in accessory issues by fouflt. Calling the question for the Transportation SustainabilityProgram Recommendation for approval commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner wu and commissioner Vice President richards and commissioner president fong great concluded item number 9 ab okay. Thank you the commission will take a lu disruptions of any kind. Proceedings. And when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. Commissioners, we left off under your regular calendar on 10 ab for cases cu at first street downtown conditional use authorization please notes on april 2016 after hearing and close Public Comment it was continued by a vote of 7 to zero. Good afternoon commissioner president fong and members of the Commission DougDepartment Staff the the item before you is the request for a conditional use authorization for the conversion of an auto station and downtown project authorization for the construction of a 14 story one and 40 feet mixed use residential building go with square feet the Property Development front harrison and lansing up to 10 hundred square feet and 90 salesforce totally 37 thousand additional square feet the basement level is assessed by a single driveway in addition one 20 bikes Parking Spaces and 20 classaction lawsuits a total of 13 thousand square feet of open space will be provided to residents through 43 private decks and several terraces on most floors of building under the provision for a downtown authorization it is seek a modification to the planning code requirement for dwelling unit endorse the site it in the rincon hill downtown Residential District along the crest of rincon area to the north and west and south of the property including the recent completed 4 hundred feet tall gsa per highrise adjacent to the west on lansing and the 4 hundred foot tall rincon hill twin towers to the southeast to the south a grammatical gallery and event place on harrison street and a night club on harrison street the property others harrison street needs a conditional use authorization for a 2 Story Development on october 14, 2015, and is historic Sailors Unions union is located in light east and a on ramp immediately south of the proposed project it was presented to the commission on april 2016 and received testimony regarding concerns about the accuracy of the suhr and the compliance with the project and the xharlt with the neighborhood and the impact of travel with the garage on first street upon considerations the commission continued this item to todays public hearing and ask the project sponsor to address the public concerns and be more compatible with the development envisioned in the rincon hill to assist the commissioners, on that Motion Commission had commissioner antonini and commissioner moore and commissioner Vice President richards to participate in the redesign with the sponsor and Department Staff the working groups convened this year to redevelop the redesign for the project the current proposal for the concerns and including the following administrations to minimize the location of the garage and the addition of a thirty foot passenger loading don store taxicab or ridership picks up and dropoffs this loading zone can be used for tenant move on in and outs. To minimize the traffic related to the loading for the building tenants an Additional Service for the garage to accommodate more move on and outs to activates the corner of harrison the cafe is increased from one 48 to 6 hundred and 10 for more successful building podium the towers window wall extended to the ground to construct a new development go incompatibility compatible the screen has been reduced and setback from the for better or worse frontage the towers north and south facing decks have been reassigned and the color was changed in recognition of the sailors building and to provide the separation between the expression a reinforcement has been added the redesign incorporates the front and harrison that be more compatible with the low rises and the one Central Development addressed gallery space on harrison street as well and since is commission received the packet an additional modification was made to the project and those graphics were presented to you today that includes the moving the railing for the decks at the presume level theyll be not visual at the street since the hearing on april 28th the the president has a request are for the continuance of this item so the plans can be further revised it is in the packet in order to proceed the Commission Must approve with additions and that includes the conditions consistent with the design proposal this motion will supercede the april 28th one in the packet in conclusion we support this this is unbalanced and consistent with the planning code and objectives and policies of the general plan and removing area plan that converts on there utilized land use and add Housing Stock in an area that encourages the development of High Density Development it is compatible with the existing scale of rincon hill the design with makings and scale for the block and constructed with high quality materials the project will provide 22 permanently Affordable Housing units and finally, the project will fully utilize the removing for the paying of impact fees. That concludes staffs presentation the project sponsor is present and theyll like to address the commission. Project sponsor. Given this is the second hearing project sponsor youll been afforded five minutes and speakers 2. Thank you for hearing us reuben, junius rose working with the yipz for the last 3 months thats a good project because of it there is a request for a continuance today weve already incorporated modifications directly in response to the last hearing and the comments the plans went out one week and a half ago and so appoint it is well vetted but leave time for the addition. Im jonathan any presentation will highlight the design changes in response to the hearing in april as well as the working groups that were held in june and july and thank you commissioner antonini, commissioner moore and commissioner Vice President richards so for taking the time to participate in those working groups they were useful and productive can we get the screen on please. Im going have to rush telephone points the first 3 has to do with with the site traffic concerns expressed from neighbors we have provided vehicle space an 11 two for tenant moves on for the activities off the sidewalk and provided a ride share setting the garage entry as well as combaurlgd the corner cafe and works very well with the bulb out on harrison and talk about urban design when we approached this we realized the Sailors Union was important and together a gateway for harrison we sobriety in alignment with the Sailors Union and it is in the middle of the plan just as is Sailors Union this is a assembly ledge and a lower tower behind this reduces this under 8 feet our podium planning materials Precast Concrete and deference to the Sailors Union and articulated the elements of building and the history vocabulary down harrison our concrepodium with the relatp to the Sailors Union just this week we received an email forward from commissioner back from the edge of this so s that they couldnt be seen we have done see and still stayed with an the required open space we have moved the railing back two feet it is fully 6 feet from the edge of the corn us and heres a view first lockup you see the railing is not visible above the cornice line at the far corner of looking at across the intersection again, you cant see the railing above the core in his line and finally id like to make a point will the lower corner at the first street and harrison our podium it 65 feet relating in scale if the Sailors Union across first of rincon one and the gallery closest to us i think that is a fitting more human scale way to cap the top of rincon hill and finish the rincon hill plan. Ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. Thank you. We may have questions for you. We may have questions later opening up for Public Comment calling names folks if you want to line up on that see of room organ yourselves and come to the podium when youre ready first speaker who is already are here. Commissioners my name is alyssa a resident of rincon hill im speaking on behalf of thirty residents and come to discuss the redesign for first street 3 main examiners traffic flow and safety please reconsider the garage on harrison street the garage entrance on festers is a safety issue emergency vehicles will be impediment from using the right two lanes this is likely to occur in two ways cars existing onto first street for the onramp are expected to move on second and fulsome to enter the two bridge only on first street in reality theyll attempt to break into the lanes on first and block the traffic or cross the lights on harrison they create a sidewalk to block emergency vehicles and the carve outs will line up cars b will block the latent prints if planning approves the planning we have serious traffic issues a pedestrian disaster is waiting to happen when this project is under construction our second concern setback please redesign the project to keep the living wall alive on jasper for the feature in our neighborhood and thirst transparent we urge transparency between planning and the communities you did make represents for the community and developer will be meeting we met with the developer but refused to allow our neighborhood to participate in the meetings we do urge you to invite the community and any meeting that you have in the future with developer and planning thank you next speaker, please. Its an incredibly skaurgz area it is backed up in San Francisco myself i wait for over an hour on fulsome and first and with an in and out garage on first will be a hazardous situation moving up to harrison will be beneficial the second the width of the sidewalk it looks like on the portion of sidewalk with 5 feed wide going along first street the better street calls for a 12 recommend a 15 width sidewalk especially with the amount of foot traffic and the amount of commuters it creates hazardous situation especially with cars coming in and out along first street it is detrimental to the community and third being the xhfbs we were received no outreach from the developer we have had a couple of meetings arranged by the neighborhood and he developer was invited i know the continuance from april it is because of lack of Neighborhood Outreach and received zero since then and you can tell but the changes in the plans none of them reflect our concerns all the changes are in the type of materials our concerns are not reflected in the changes thank you very much. Good afternoon commissioner president fong and commissioners nice to see you congratulations okay so i have a bulb out problem and questions when is i think capable land use what do you mean is if a discrete thing im curious on first street the traffic is horrible and up on first street is a bad idea it does effect me personally i my students cant get to me the traffic is rush hour and i think there