The packet i did not say that. The existing 44. 1944 the question i had this a couple weeks ago in terms of rentcontrolled units the ellis act is there a legal existence of a rer8dz after that is off the marketed if those were rentcontrolled unit theyll be in rent control i imagine. Corey can chime in. Ill chime in and say this is thats a great question for the board i dont have an answer. Sure please that would be helpful if you have something you inaudible . Sir youll have to speak into the microphone. Heres something that from the San FranciscoTenants Union and as you can see there are some restrictions their 5 and 10 years that was specifically in regard to our project is the lower one. Can you read it to use it is too small for me to see. From the building is down the road and units in a newly constructed building are offered for rented one 5 years restrictions will apply so 5 years or 16 years. So it is interesting i said too to two weeks ago i thought ellis act buildings should not be an additional bump this was my quote and someone the press through that back at me this Commission Voted to demolish rentcontrolled unit the past they were active rentcontrolled unit and i do believe after 5 years unless their rented out again looking at the current lay out it is a inner country convened that will not be renirpd youre not getting the entitlement its been 16 years and good project ill vote to support. Dramatically thank you, commissioners quickly i just want to speak to the notion of going from the to 12 and why we pushed the project sponsor to be honest anytime a unit comes in it looks like it is avoiding but this week we are concerned whatever a 9 unit building and possible to add units that gives us this thats why we pushed them and also on the orientation of the building the orientation minimum inninmri there is a mot that has been seconded to approve that matter with conditions commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner Vice President richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and commissioners that places us on 13 ab for the cases. At chapman 3457b street youll consider a conditional use authorization and Zoning Administrator will consider rear yard variance. Okay giving me kimberly planning staff a request. A qualifying pursuant to planning code section to allow construction of a singlefamily dwelling on a sub stated lot the lot measures one thousand 5 hundred plus square feet and less than 25 feet in weight a anytime of seven hundred plus and 25 feet are required respect the proposed building for this site and 3r one thousand plus singlefamily unit with a health of approximately 27 feet the project is located on the southeast corner of chapman and fulsome within the rh1 bernal height special use district the subject property is currently a vacant corner lot that is substandard with 70 feet of footage along chapman and 14 feet along fulsome the adjacent property to the south is a two story singlefamily dwelling the ante a 3 story singlefamily detrimentally dwell it is zoned rh1 and p for public generally developed a twostory and public space of the hill since the publication the department has received 8 additional letters in opposition and two in support of protein project the project sponsor has conducted outreach through the preapplication meeting held in august of 2013 and met with the bernal height east slope board in 2014 and again in december of 2014 once the project was scheduled for a hearing this january the project sponsor conducted a second voluntary outreach january 21st of 2016 and has been working with the an adjacent neighbor to address the concerns for privacy and security the other issues and considerations regarding this lot is that this lot was established in 1916 from surplus public land to develop chapman and sold unwarned for development in 1969. Development of the thinking warranted has been redesigned since the sale of the property 6 times the Zoning Administrator has denied development in 1979, 81 and 87 the concentration has a nonconditional use in noah 1 and 2005 those are in your packet the lot is a substandard lot in a area of predominantly small lots on a corner it is a curving street that neighbors have raised concerns about regarding traffic and safety at that corner neighbors expressed concerns of preservation of security and noise to the adjacent property and that the project is not in keeping with neighborhood character the project will be providing the required minimum rear yard of 24. 4 feet in an additional location on neutron the if you would to allow the corner of fulsome and chapman that rear yard didnt meet the rear yard requirement for planning code section which is subject to the variance proceeding the basis for Planning Department recommendation for approval is that housing policy in San Francisco has developed since this lot was created in 1960 and 1979 and ti the variance letters have sited one issue it should serve as neighborhood parking lot and further the 2014 Housing Element courageous oust that are indicate accurate for families and children the areas there are amenities in support of families and in concert count housing crisis the Current Development offers a solution that is addressed the initials and further under those a executive order from the mayor entitled housing and preservation of the Housing Stock and the department represents this to facilitate the singlefamily dwelling and encouraging the density to meet those policy goals the proposed design and contextu contextually provides a translation and the e slope design board didnt support this but does now further to address concerns about safety at the corner i brought the project to our street Design Advisory Team that includes professional staff if dpw and planning and they dont foresee increased traffic or safety with the proposed project the existing conditions of vehicles that concludes my remarks on the south side of chapman immediately east of fulsome are the limiting facts and circumstances at the intersection this is what the letters of opposition have also acknowledged that concludes my presentation. Im available to answer any questions thank you. Thank you. Project sponsor. Good afternoon thank you for your time. I wanted to take a brief moment to introduce my family and share with you how this project relates to our lives 14 or 13 years ago i moved to here in bernal height currently i start a small architectural project that is located the fire hydrant office and we have children so when the opportunity as like the previous case a vacant piece of lands that had a story about that and we all of the evidence the entitlement action i thought deeply what a family needed in order to live and thrive it in bernal height the buildings were two large and obstructed the view and pedestrian traffic didnt give back to the community from an architectural prospective your design evaluated the main mass of the unimpediment use and for a conforming sidewalk at the site massing coordinates with the topography into a neighborhood prospective the nature the design is we work with the adjacent neighbors to modify the design to address the issues they have with site safety weve added security gates and a front yard grate and a parapet a Construction Impact Mitigation measures several changes are incorporated into the plans you have before you and finally from a practical prospective that allows our family to remain in bernal height to have private for a growing girl and boy and cuts my commute the site if i may overhead a survey of the sites the area calculations questioned at 1, 23 square feet you know it is located on the south side of bernal height this picture didnt do it justice two blinds property walls it abuts the site and up chapman it is served are conversed street not an intersection per say our proposal provides for a ground floor that leaves 68 percent of the site open on the ground floor we have note were taking two car parking and maintaining those and providing one car parking the building offstreet and have offstreet bike parking provide i doed and additionally to note ze we have allowed for a proper 3 foot wide sidewalk that will be encroaching into our property right now that is 19 inches wide not a problem. The main level again, a singlefamily home two bedrooms and kitchen and dining room and has the master bedroom and a roof deck with regard to the exterior weve worked to provide a vertical woodeding horizontal the middle and in the design that essentially takes the massing and locates it far away from the corner and unimpediment views weve proved e proposed blow a wall belief the sidewalk open fulsome as it wraps around and surrender it toshgz transition the corner from ive the adjacent third Story Building with the fulton second story dwelling unit. The projects necessity is the fact a new singlefamily home on a unutilized land is no extension that is required a road electrical there is gas and it would otherwise remain an underutilized piece of dirt in San Francisco additionally wooiflgd of the sidewalk represents in my opinion a necessary enhancement to the Pedestrian Safety and he hope the commission understand this modest 28 or 29 square feet home adds to the Housing Stock it is only one unit but it allows our family to stay in bernal height the creation of and new singlefamily home can be debated a specifically but parties we call bernal height home for over a decade and able be able to discuss the relative merits for a home on that site it is important to note that enjoys a letter of support we participated in twoes slope designer mergers one was as preoperative meeting and one additional review neighborhood meeting weeks before this meeting we actively wet metro with the immediate adjacent neighbors to respond to their questions and several features were modified on the backside of building and the security gates we redesigned the location of our trees not to obstruct the views around the corner and question redesigned the lower fence elements we worked with the rdt and actually worked with the east slope to clarify the project massing it is neighborly and it is practical i extinguish to accomplish the comments of the people that may become my neighbors it was not different today than proposed heres the picture heres what was proposed in 2000 all 9 previous entitlements attempts were to just domicile a entitle this project was suggested with 10 foot floor to floor ceiling height and the cubic feet this of the not supported by the east slope it is 14 thousand cubic feet with an approval question is safety the road curves not straight in your packet a traffic study completed as part of entitlements efforts and again that was scrutinized with the planner by the City Department at this point there was no suggestions made as to how to address the corner by that professional Consultant Team you know the main goal to take an underutilized piece of real estate that has a proposed project that puts more housing and keeps a family in bernal height thank you very much. Im sorry is that complete Public Comment. Okay opening it up for Public Comment and gotten to a point i need glas glasses calling names as want to line up on this side of room. If your name has been called, please approach the podium and state your name. Im a resident of bernal height also there for 15 years but the south side he and north side of the hill im socially familiar with the project sponsor and im a member of the northwest design board for bernal height im enthusiastic about this project it does a lot with unusual site a great job of transition from the third story from the second story on fulsome and it is a nice looking design the preservation of the open space the corner is a gift to the neighborhood it is about a retiring building you can button in that spot i think that the architecture theyve promoted responds to the adjacent buildings and acts sort of a transition between them i am not sure what of the objections all. Im sorry. To interrupt you, your pressing the button there if you guys can line on that side of room. Sorry sir. No problem. Ive drive that corner and building that the natural terrain makes it a natural tendency to slow down as they reach at turn and i dont believe anything about the proposed project that will change it will be a improvement to the weighed width so see fit to allow this family to stay in bernal height. Next speaker anybody. Good afternoon my name is christian a technical engineer and a residents of bruno heights ive known jason profiling over a year weve worked on a number of projects in any experience he excelsis in welding and construction teem contaminate from the beginning to make sure his projects are well engineered and an personal level ive observed hes well licked because mason supports local businesses and mason and his family are an asset i remembering ask you approve the conditional use and allow jason to stay in the neighborhood he loves thank you. Ive known jason a key part of neighborhood and he works there so for these a family out of bernal height he hope the board supports this project thank you. Hi, im vernon lived in bernal height for 12 years masonic mason and known jason our kids are the same age and still go to school but the majority of the times in bernal height he lived down the street and walked paved that intersection a decade of walking my dog i often wonder before this how it will be used a variety of maybe unkept lawn or for sale signs left there and broken down fences it is a difficult pot to this build something i saw the for sale and said oh, my god this is great people are good friends with mason and known him for forever and a well liquidated Community Member it will be a shame if this were not approved it will continue to be a vacant area and no traffic there is this corner thousands of time with my dog no traffic so it is a good point for me. Hull my name is barbara i live on rovrlg koran the general area and also i dont have an irrational be with the design aim interested in the safety and the effect that has on the corner by putting the not having privacy at all at the future owner can put up a fence that impedes the site line as the most incredible to the safety of the intersection also curious about the Square Footage of the lot as the sum of the parts has taken from the assessor oversees information and accumulate u calculating the Square Footage for the street rightofway that will be because of the upper and lower arc the roadway exceeds 70 feet and everyone is 25 minimum that is 1740 that adds up roughly one square feet the sum of the street the rectangle stape of the tree lots taken together by the tree lots i mean the roadway and the other lot immediately north that have and also has a curved southern boundary to the map is not confirming the Square Footage of that line it begs the question this is truly accurate to i want to put that out there so with respect to the life safety this traffic study joo 3 refers to the lack of traffic yes, in general anytimely it serves the policy right now, however, the neighbor at banks pefrl verified the San Francisco fire truck and muni bus got stuck on the access to those hours the student making the curves the only other paved streets to have access is that area unreliable and couldnt count open having life safety so it relies on that intersection at fulsome and chapman and the traffic study refers to see a ellis act but a proposal for extending fulsome that changes the configuration of that intersection altogether that makes begs the question of what sort of planning overall it going for traffic and life safety in that neighborhood thats over concern thank you. Hello, im a reliant of bernal height i live a thousand feet from the lot ive known mason for 10 years ive lived in bernal height and have my office the mission i have 85 employees a quarter of them live on bernal height more of them want to but because of the lack of Housing Stock i have a similar family to mason i have a boil and live in a big home it emphasize the need for a larger Housing Stock and certainly appreciate masons need for his family to do so as a Community Member mason a quiet wonderfully wonderful i find his tricks to my children at halloween parade hes obviously a pillar of the community and this is one reason to encourage this type of development for the community to keep them in bernal height im a avid kooifl i design my lifelike mason to have a recycling cycling there is a storage built into this house and mason is attempting to have a Climate Friendly future were all trying to live this is why this project is good this generally gives foot pact back to the communities as a cyclists i use that street on the north side to the ceda to portland as a cyclist you appreciate the traffic endearing will this will be one of the at least concerns with any approve of safety on a as deep of steep slope everyone is moving slowly this whether theres the visibility bus of the gardens and looking at architecturally this is a very well, good house this is not a monster home it is humble and i think this really does things for the lot it is the type of green home we need to the future of San Francisco my wife is a helper to give me and works one of the plots in the Community Guardian at bernal height she would last week to thoroughly enjoy the bernal height and on all fronts i support this project. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Commissioners and commissioner president fong thank you for temperatures this time im herb i live on fulsome street ive lived in bernal height for over thirty years i live kittycorner to the promoted development in any meetings with mason hes been very congenial and ive appreciated listening to him however, i must respectfully and regretfully oppose this project like my neighbor barbara we have more of a problem with the safety and